On 11/03/2014 08:45 AM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31 2014, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> I agree that the CMA allocation should not be allowed to succeed, but
>> the dma_alloc_coherent() allocation should succeed. If we look at the
>> sysport driver, there are kmalloc() calls to
On Fri, Oct 31 2014, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> I agree that the CMA allocation should not be allowed to succeed, but
> the dma_alloc_coherent() allocation should succeed. If we look at the
> sysport driver, there are kmalloc() calls to initialize private
> structures, those will succeed (except
On Fri, Oct 31 2014, Florian Fainelli wrote:
I agree that the CMA allocation should not be allowed to succeed, but
the dma_alloc_coherent() allocation should succeed. If we look at the
sysport driver, there are kmalloc() calls to initialize private
structures, those will succeed (except under
On 11/03/2014 08:45 AM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31 2014, Florian Fainelli wrote:
I agree that the CMA allocation should not be allowed to succeed, but
the dma_alloc_coherent() allocation should succeed. If we look at the
sysport driver, there are kmalloc() calls to initialize
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 17:28 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> I guess that it is okay that bcm_sysport_open() return -EINTR?
actually, since CMA alloc is hidden behind dma_alloc_coherent(), all you
get back is NULL and then return ENOMEM.
--
Maxime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi Joonsoo,
On 10/31/2014 01:28 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:08:46PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> While debugging why some dma_alloc_coherent() allocations where
>> returning NULL on our brcmstb platform, specifically with
>>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:08:46PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While debugging why some dma_alloc_coherent() allocations where
> returning NULL on our brcmstb platform, specifically with
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmcsysport.c, I came across the
> fatal_signal_pending()
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:08:46PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
While debugging why some dma_alloc_coherent() allocations where
returning NULL on our brcmstb platform, specifically with
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmcsysport.c, I came across the
fatal_signal_pending() check in
Hi Joonsoo,
On 10/31/2014 01:28 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:08:46PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hello,
While debugging why some dma_alloc_coherent() allocations where
returning NULL on our brcmstb platform, specifically with
On Fri, 2014-10-31 at 17:28 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
I guess that it is okay that bcm_sysport_open() return -EINTR?
actually, since CMA alloc is hidden behind dma_alloc_coherent(), all you
get back is NULL and then return ENOMEM.
--
Maxime
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hello,
While debugging why some dma_alloc_coherent() allocations where
returning NULL on our brcmstb platform, specifically with
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmcsysport.c, I came across the
fatal_signal_pending() check in mm/page_alloc.c which is there.
This driver calls dma_alloc_coherent(,
Hello,
While debugging why some dma_alloc_coherent() allocations where
returning NULL on our brcmstb platform, specifically with
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bcmcsysport.c, I came across the
fatal_signal_pending() check in mm/page_alloc.c which is there.
This driver calls dma_alloc_coherent(,
12 matches
Mail list logo