On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(I've seen a 50%
performance hit on 2.4 with just a thousand or two threads compared to
2.6)
Was that 2.4 kernel a vendor kernel with the O(1) scheduler?
no, a kernel.org kernel. the 2.6 kernel is so much faster for
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I've seen a 50%
performance hit on 2.4 with just a thousand or two threads compared to
2.6)
Was that 2.4 kernel a vendor kernel with the O(1) scheduler?
no, a kernel.org kernel. the 2.6 kernel is so much faster for
2 matches
Mail list logo
