Am 25.02.2013 14:23, schrieb David Laight:
A proper solution would be to either return false if net.ipv6.bindv6only is
true and optval is false
(which would break downward compatibility because it wouldn't just be a default
and setsockopt might
return an error) or to introduce a new sysctl var
> > A proper solution would be to either return false if net.ipv6.bindv6only is
> > true and optval is false
> (which would break downward compatibility because it wouldn't just be a
> default and setsockopt might
> return an error) or to introduce a new sysctl variable like
> net.ipv6.bindv6onl
Hello.
Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 22.02.2013 16:21, schrieb Alexander Holler:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm searching for a way to either enforce IPV6_V6ONLY or to block
>> IPv4-mapped addresses on ipv6-sockets (e.g. by using iptables) system-wide.
>>
>> E.g. net.ipv6.bindv6only doesn't help if something
Am 22.02.2013 16:21, schrieb Alexander Holler:
Hello,
I'm searching for a way to either enforce IPV6_V6ONLY or to block
IPv4-mapped addresses on ipv6-sockets (e.g. by using iptables) system-wide.
E.g. net.ipv6.bindv6only doesn't help if something calls
int v6on = 0;
setsockopt(sd, IPPROTO_IPV6
4 matches
Mail list logo