Re: Disableing USB.

2000-12-08 Thread Bryan Whitehead
> Er... Well, the traditional solution has been "don't build it into your > kernel if you don't want it", but in the case of stock kernels, that > isn't always an option, I suppose. Theoretically, the two devices > shouldn't step on each other, but this is a computer. Theory is so far > removed

Re: Disableing USB.

2000-12-07 Thread David Riley
Bryan Whitehead wrote: > > Is there a way I can disble a part of the kernel that is compiled into the > kernel? For example I'd like to pass this to lilo: "usb=disable" and then > the usb code is not loaded even though USB has been built into the kernel. > > Is such a feature stupid? Or has this

Disableing USB.

2000-12-07 Thread Bryan Whitehead
Is there a way I can disble a part of the kernel that is compiled into the kernel? For example I'd like to pass this to lilo: "usb=disable" and then the usb code is not loaded even though USB has been built into the kernel. Is such a feature stupid? Or has this already been implemented? It would