Re: Djprobes questions

* Masami Hiramatsu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > Hi Masami, > > > > I recently had to add support for inline code patching on i386 to my > > marker infrastructure. Clearly, it looks like what is done in djprobes, > > with the main difference that I

Re: Djprobes questions

* Masami Hiramatsu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi Mathieu, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: Hi Masami, I recently had to add support for inline code patching on i386 to my marker infrastructure. Clearly, it looks like what is done in djprobes, with the main difference that I only patch the

Re: Djprobes questions

Hi Mathieu, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Hi Masami, > > I recently had to add support for inline code patching on i386 to my > marker infrastructure. Clearly, it looks like what is done in djprobes, > with the main difference that I only patch the immediate value of a 2 > bytes "load immediate"

Djprobes questions

Hi Masami, I recently had to add support for inline code patching on i386 to my marker infrastructure. Clearly, it looks like what is done in djprobes, with the main difference that I only patch the immediate value of a 2 bytes "load immediate" instruction. I think I found a solution to one of

Djprobes questions

Hi Masami, I recently had to add support for inline code patching on i386 to my marker infrastructure. Clearly, it looks like what is done in djprobes, with the main difference that I only patch the immediate value of a 2 bytes load immediate instruction. I think I found a solution to one of the

Re: Djprobes questions

Hi Mathieu, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: Hi Masami, I recently had to add support for inline code patching on i386 to my marker infrastructure. Clearly, it looks like what is done in djprobes, with the main difference that I only patch the immediate value of a 2 bytes load immediate