Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-13 Thread Peter Teoh
On 2/13/08, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote: > > some questions: > > > > a. the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing > > file via "procname" search.not sure if it is correct (as per > > attached,

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote: > some questions: > > a. the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing > file via "procname" search.not sure if it is correct (as per > attached, complete?) I don't see anything attached :( > b. what is the

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote: some questions: a. the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing file via procname search.not sure if it is correct (as per attached, complete?) I don't see anything attached :( b. what is the diff

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-13 Thread Peter Teoh
On 2/13/08, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote: some questions: a. the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing file via procname search.not sure if it is correct (as per attached, complete?) I don't

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Peter Teoh
On 2/13/08, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote: > > Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Hi all... > >>> > >>> Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote: > Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: >> >> >>> Hi all... >>> >>> Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel >>> documentation better? I have done (slow) start

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Manish Katiyar
On Feb 13, 2008 11:29 AM, Scott Lovenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > > > > Hi all... > > Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel > documentation better? I have done (slow) start by

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries]

2008-02-12 Thread Scott Lovenberg
Randy Dunlap wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Peter Teoh
On 2/13/08, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > > > Hi all... > > > > Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel > > documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= > > kernel param. It's

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: > Hi all... > > Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel > documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= > kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it. > Feedback?

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it. Feedback? regards, Mulyadi. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it. Feedback?

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Mulyadi Santosa
Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it. Feedback? regards, Mulyadi. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Peter Teoh
On 2/13/08, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries]

2008-02-12 Thread Scott Lovenberg
Randy Dunlap wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile= kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Manish Katiyar
On Feb 13, 2008 11:29 AM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Randy Dunlap wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote: Randy Dunlap wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-12 Thread Peter Teoh
On 2/13/08, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote: Randy Dunlap wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote: Hi all... Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel documentation

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-11 Thread Peter Teoh
On Feb 12, 2008 2:17 PM, Scott Lovenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2008 12:23 AM, Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under > /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written by > Rik). > >

Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries (resent due to errors)

2008-02-11 Thread Peter Teoh
I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written by Rik). How about /proc/sys/net? or all other directories under /sys or /proc fs? Wouldn't it be useful to have a centralized store located in

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-11 Thread Scott Lovenberg
On Feb 12, 2008 1:17 AM, Scott Lovenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 12, 2008 12:23 AM, Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under > > /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written

Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries (resent due to errors)

2008-02-11 Thread Peter Teoh
I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written by Rik). How about /proc/sys/net? or all other directories under /sys or /proc fs? Wouldn't it be useful to have a centralized store located in

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-11 Thread Peter Teoh
On Feb 12, 2008 2:17 PM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 12, 2008 12:23 AM, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written by Rik). How about

Re: Documentation about sysfs/procfs entries

2008-02-11 Thread Scott Lovenberg
On Feb 12, 2008 1:17 AM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 12, 2008 12:23 AM, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written by Rik).