On 2/13/08, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote:
> > some questions:
> >
> > a. the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing
> > file via "procname" search.not sure if it is correct (as per
> > attached,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote:
> some questions:
>
> a. the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing
> file via "procname" search.not sure if it is correct (as per
> attached, complete?)
I don't see anything attached :(
> b. what is the
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote:
some questions:
a. the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing
file via procname search.not sure if it is correct (as per
attached, complete?)
I don't see anything attached :(
b. what is the diff
On 2/13/08, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Peter Teoh wrote:
some questions:
a. the list of parameters can presumably be extracted from existing
file via procname search.not sure if it is correct (as per
attached, complete?)
I don't
On 2/13/08, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi all...
> >>>
> >>> Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all...
>>>
>>> Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
>>> documentation better? I have done (slow) start
On Feb 13, 2008 11:29 AM, Scott Lovenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi all...
>
> Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
> documentation better? I have done (slow) start by
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
Hi all...
Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile=
kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I
On 2/13/08, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
>
> > Hi all...
> >
> > Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
> > documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile=
> > kernel param. It's
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
> documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile=
> kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it.
> Feedback?
Hi all...
Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile=
kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it.
Feedback?
regards,
Mulyadi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
Hi all...
Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile=
kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it.
Feedback?
Hi all...
Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile=
kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I did it.
Feedback?
regards,
Mulyadi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 2/13/08, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
Hi all...
Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile=
kernel param. It's not accepted
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
Hi all...
Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing profile=
kernel param. It's not accepted by Adrian Bunk, but at least I
On Feb 13, 2008 11:29 AM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
Hi all...
Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
Hi all...
Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
documentation better? I have done (slow) start by editing
On 2/13/08, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:59:43AM -0500, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:08:12 +0700 Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
Hi all...
Here's my idea: what if we collaborate to extend and make the kernel
documentation
On Feb 12, 2008 2:17 PM, Scott Lovenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2008 12:23 AM, Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under
> /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written by
> Rik).
> >
I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under
/proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written
by Rik).
How about /proc/sys/net? or all other directories under /sys or /proc fs?
Wouldn't it be useful to have a centralized store located in
On Feb 12, 2008 1:17 AM, Scott Lovenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2008 12:23 AM, Peter Teoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under
> > /proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written
I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under
/proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written
by Rik).
How about /proc/sys/net? or all other directories under /sys or /proc fs?
Wouldn't it be useful to have a centralized store located in
On Feb 12, 2008 2:17 PM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 12:23 AM, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under
/proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written by
Rik).
How about
On Feb 12, 2008 1:17 AM, Scott Lovenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 12, 2008 12:23 AM, Peter Teoh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was looking for documentation on the kstack_depth_to_print under
/proc/sys/kernel, and I found it in Documentation/sysctl.txt (written by
Rik).
24 matches
Mail list logo