Re: Drop support to compressed modules?

2012-09-23 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Friday 2012-09-21 23:41, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > >While fixing a bug in kmod related to using compressed modules (that >already existed in module-init-tools) we stopped to think about these >questions. Dave made a couple of benchmarks and performance wise it's >better to use uncompressed modul

Re: Drop support to compressed modules?

2012-09-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 21 September 2012 17:41:44 Lucas De Marchi wrote: > I'd like to ask people the following question: why are you using > compressed modules? Is it only for the disk space or is there any > performance related reason? i've only seen it to save on disk space -mike signature.asc Description

Drop support to compressed modules?

2012-09-21 Thread Lucas De Marchi
Hey, I'd like to ask people the following question: why are you using compressed modules? Is it only for the disk space or is there any performance related reason? While fixing a bug in kmod related to using compressed modules (that already existed in module-init-tools) we stopped to think about