Re: Dropping some patches from sched-devel

On Jan 25, 2008 5:58 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sure, done. Thanks. > what method are you using of determining quality? I was talking about code quality: adding a dependency on jiffies does not seems like a good idea. But also, about the clock quality, I was focusing on getting

Re: Dropping some patches from sched-devel

* Guillaume Chazarain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > Can I talk you into dropping these patches of mine from sched-devel > (or not send them to Linus): > > da0f9440cdcb1edd5424de91f326de83de3fe5f9 sched: make sure jiffies is > up to date before calling __update_rq_clock() > 6eb300ad

Dropping some patches from sched-devel

Hi Ingo, Can I talk you into dropping these patches of mine from sched-devel (or not send them to Linus): da0f9440cdcb1edd5424de91f326de83de3fe5f9 sched: make sure jiffies is up to date before calling __update_rq_clock() 6eb300ad38fef6db4efe177067a65aaa771596da sched: fix rq->clock overflows dete