Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 13:59 +0200, John Sigler wrote:
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS,
just don't enable modversions.. it doesn't provide you any real safety
at all. and it makes your build a LOT slower.
I'm
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 13:59 +0200, John Sigler wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
> CONFIG_MODVERSIONS,
just don't enable modversions.. it doesn't provide you any real safety
at all. and it makes your build a LOT slower.
-
To
Hello everyone,
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, then checksums for various functions (all exported
functions?) and various structures (which ones?) will be included inside
the kernel image, and written to Module.symvers. When an out-of-tree
module
Hello everyone,
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, then checksums for various functions (all exported
functions?) and various structures (which ones?) will be included inside
the kernel image, and written to Module.symvers. When an out-of-tree
module
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 13:59 +0200, John Sigler wrote:
Hello everyone,
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS,
just don't enable modversions.. it doesn't provide you any real safety
at all. and it makes your build a LOT slower.
-
To unsubscribe
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 13:59 +0200, John Sigler wrote:
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS,
just don't enable modversions.. it doesn't provide you any real safety
at all. and it makes your build a LOT slower.
I'm
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 22 2007 10:13, John Sigler wrote:
How do I list the checksums within a module?
Is there a simpler way to list all the checksums?
22:25 ichi:~ > modinfo aes
srcversion: 8CB82B3A254D5A950FD0D14
I think this one checksum is computed out of all functions that
the
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 22 2007 10:13, John Sigler wrote:
How do I list the checksums within a module?
Is there a simpler way to list all the checksums?
22:25 ichi:~ modinfo aes
srcversion: 8CB82B3A254D5A950FD0D14
I think this one checksum is computed out of all functions that
the
On May 22 2007 10:13, John Sigler wrote:
>> > How do I list the checksums within a module?
>> > Is there a simpler way to list all the checksums?
>>
>> 22:25 ichi:~ > modinfo aes
>> srcversion: 8CB82B3A254D5A950FD0D14
>>
>> I think this one checksum is computed out of all functions that
>>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:27:06PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 18 2007 17:02, John Sigler wrote:
I'm getting "disagrees about version of symbol struct_module" messages,
and I'm trying to understand why.
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 18 2007 17:02, John Sigler wrote:
I'm getting "disagrees about version of symbol struct_module" messages,
and I'm trying to understand why.
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, then checksums for various functions (all
On May 22 2007 10:13, John Sigler wrote:
How do I list the checksums within a module?
Is there a simpler way to list all the checksums?
22:25 ichi:~ modinfo aes
srcversion: 8CB82B3A254D5A950FD0D14
I think this one checksum is computed out of all functions that
the module uses.
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 18 2007 17:02, John Sigler wrote:
I'm getting disagrees about version of symbol struct_module messages,
and I'm trying to understand why.
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, then checksums for various functions (all
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:27:06PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 18 2007 17:02, John Sigler wrote:
I'm getting disagrees about version of symbol struct_module messages,
and I'm trying to understand why.
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:27:06PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
> On May 18 2007 17:02, John Sigler wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting "disagrees about version of symbol struct_module" messages,
> > and I'm trying to understand why.
> >
> > As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
>
On May 18 2007 17:02, John Sigler wrote:
>
> I'm getting "disagrees about version of symbol struct_module" messages,
> and I'm trying to understand why.
>
> As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
> CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, then checksums for various functions (all exported
>
Hello everyone,
I'm getting "disagrees about version of symbol struct_module" messages,
and I'm trying to understand why.
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, then checksums for various functions (all exported
functions?) and various structures
Hello everyone,
I'm getting disagrees about version of symbol struct_module messages,
and I'm trying to understand why.
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, then checksums for various functions (all exported
functions?) and various structures
On May 18 2007 17:02, John Sigler wrote:
I'm getting disagrees about version of symbol struct_module messages,
and I'm trying to understand why.
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, then checksums for various functions (all exported
functions?)
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:27:06PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 18 2007 17:02, John Sigler wrote:
I'm getting disagrees about version of symbol struct_module messages,
and I'm trying to understand why.
As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
20 matches
Mail list logo
