Re: EDD failures since edd=off patch

Matt Domsch schrieb: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:11:52PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >>Hi Matt, >> >>it seems the edd=off patch has caused some problems with >>some machines I have access to. They simply don't boot >>anymore unless I specify edd=foo. foo can be {off,skip,bar} >>so it s

Re: EDD failures since edd=off patch

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:11:52PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Hi Matt, > > it seems the edd=off patch has caused some problems with > some machines I have access to. They simply don't boot > anymore unless I specify edd=foo. foo can be {off,skip,bar} > so it seems the hang on boot is r

EDD failures since edd=off patch

Hi Matt, it seems the edd=off patch has caused some problems with some machines I have access to. They simply don't boot anymore unless I specify edd=foo. foo can be {off,skip,bar} so it seems the hang on boot is related to the parser not finding the parameter it is looking for. I looked through t