On 01/29/2015 05:06 PM, Scot Doyle wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> On 29 January 2015 at 02:27, Scot Doyle wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:10:59PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On 29 January 2015 at 02:27, Scot Doyle wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:10:59PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:1
On 29 January 2015 at 02:27, Scot Doyle wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:10:59PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
>> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:14:03PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
>> > > > When I tested, kexec_file
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:10:59PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:14:03PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> > > >
[Dropping Andi into CC, which I should have done to start with, since
he wrote the original page, and might also have some comments]
Hello Vivek,
>> I've made various adjustments to the page in the light of your comments
>> above. Thanks!
>
> Thank you for following it up and improving kexec man
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > Hello Vivek,
> >
> > >> I've made various adjustments to the page in the light of your comments
> > >> above. Thanks!
> > >
> > > Thank you for following it up and improving k
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:14:03PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > > Hello Vivek,
> > >
> > > >> I've made various adjustments to the page in the light of your comments
> > > >>
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:10:59PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:14:03PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
> > > > When I tested, kexec_file_load required CONFIG_RELOCATABLE. Is the same
> > >
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:14:03PM +, Scot Doyle wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello Vivek,
> > > >
> > > > >> I've made various adju
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:04:38AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
Hi Michael,
[..]
> >> * the number of bytes copied from userspace is min(bufsz, memsz)
> >
> > Yes. bufsz can not be more than memsz. There is a check to validate
> > this in kernel.
> >
> > result = -EINVAL;
> >
Hi Vivek,
On 01/27/2015 03:24 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:30:25PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> [..]
>>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Please find my responses below. Sorry, I got stuck in other work and
> forgot about this thread.
>
>> So, returning to the kexeec_seg
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> [Dropping Andi into CC, which I should have done to start with, since
> he wrote the original page, and might also have some comments]
>
> Hello Vivek,
>
> >> I've made various adjustments to the page in the light of y
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 02:30:25PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
[..]
>
Hi Michael,
Please find my responses below. Sorry, I got stuck in other work and
forgot about this thread.
> So, returning to the kexeec_segment structure:
>
>struct kexec_segment {
>
Hello Vivek,
Ping!
Cheers,
Michael
On 16 January 2015 at 14:30, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hello Vivek,
>
> Thanks for your comments! I've added some further text to
> the page based on those comments. See some follow-up
> questions below.
>
> On 01/12/2015 11:16 PM, Vivek Goyal wro
Hello Vivek,
Thanks for your comments! I've added some further text to
the page based on those comments. See some follow-up
questions below.
On 01/12/2015 11:16 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:17:56PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>
> [..]
.BR KEXEC_ON_CRASH
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:17:56PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
[..]
> >> .BR KEXEC_ON_CRASH " (since Linux 2.6.13)"
> >> Execute the new kernel automatically on a system crash.
> >> .\" FIXME Explain in more detail how KEXEC_ON_CRASH is actually used
>
> I wasn't expecting that you
Hi Vivek,
Thanks for your comments, and my apologies for a the long delayed follow-up.
On 11/11/2014 10:30 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:17:49PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hello Vivek (and all),
>>
>> Thanks for the kexec_file_load() patch [for the kexec_lo
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:17:49PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Vivek (and all),
>
> Thanks for the kexec_file_load() patch [for the kexec_load(2) man page]
> that you quite some time ago sent. I have merged it and done some
> substantial editing as well. Could you please take
Hello Vivek (and all),
Thanks for the kexec_file_load() patch [for the kexec_load(2) man page]
that you quite some time ago sent. I have merged it and done some
substantial editing as well. Could you please take a look at the
draft below, and check that the kexec_file_load() material is okay.
Ple
19 matches
Mail list logo
