[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:54:34PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 20 Jan, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > Not true, see natsemi.c (in 2.4.x at least).
> >
> > Correct, and the cards really work with it.
>
> natsemi did not work with 2.2.17 on a remote system I
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 01:54:34PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 20 Jan, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Not true, see natsemi.c (in 2.4.x at least).
>
> Correct, and the cards really work with it.
natsemi did not work with 2.2.17 on a remote system I do work on, but
did work with the 2.4.0-in
On 20 Jan, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Not true, see natsemi.c (in 2.4.x at least).
Correct, and the cards really work with it.
--
Servus,
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at ht
Tobias Burnus wrote:
> I think those drivers have not yet been merged. Since I happend to have
> those (and had problem to get them run with the default kernel) I'd like
> to asked whether those can be included into the kernel. They are GNU
> licensed. Seemingly the SiS updates the existing sis900
Hi,
I think those drivers have not yet been merged. Since I happend to have
those (and had problem to get them run with the default kernel) I'd like
to asked whether those can be included into the kernel. They are GNU
licensed. Seemingly the SiS updates the existing sis900 driver, the
FA311 is no
5 matches
Mail list logo