In article <0106250203070J.00430@starship> you wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2001 01:49, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>> Daniel Phillips writes:
>> > On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>> >> By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm
>> >> as seen in Tux2. Thi
On Monday 25 June 2001 01:49, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Daniel Phillips writes:
> > On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> >> By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm
> >> as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity.
> >> Yep, it whips yo
Daniel Phillips writes:
> On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>> By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm
>> as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity.
>> Yep, it whips your typical journalling filesystem. Look at what
>> we have in th
On Monday 25 June 2001 00:54, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm
> as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity.
> Yep, it whips your typical journalling filesystem. Look at what
> we have in the superblock (boot sector):
>
>
By dumb luck (?), FAT32 is compatible with the phase-tree algorithm
as seen in Tux2. This means it offers full data integrity.
Yep, it whips your typical journalling filesystem. Look at what
we have in the superblock (boot sector):
__u32 fat32_length; /* sectors/FAT */
__u16 flags;
5 matches
Mail list logo