On Fri 24-08-12 17:08:36, Li Haifeng wrote:
> 2012/8/24 Michal Hocko :
> > On Fri 24-08-12 10:08:20, Li Haifeng wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Subject: [PATCH] Fix the page address of higher page's buddy calculation
> >>
> >> Calculate the page address of higher page's buddy should be based
> >> higher_page
2012/8/24 Michal Hocko :
> On Fri 24-08-12 10:08:20, Li Haifeng wrote:
> [...]
>> Subject: [PATCH] Fix the page address of higher page's buddy calculation
>>
>> Calculate the page address of higher page's buddy should be based
>> higher_page with the offset between index of higher page and
>> index
On Fri 24-08-12 10:08:20, Li Haifeng wrote:
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix the page address of higher page's buddy calculation
>
> Calculate the page address of higher page's buddy should be based
> higher_page with the offset between index of higher page and
> index of higher page's buddy.
Sorry f
t;> >>> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:27:19 +0800
>> >>> Subject: [PATCH] Fixup the page of buddy_higher address's calculation
>> >>
>> >> Some general questions:
>> >> Any word about the change? Is it really that obvious? Why do you think the
On Thu 23-08-12 20:30:34, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:21:06PM +0800, Li Haifeng wrote:
[...]
> >>> From d7cd78f9d71a5c9ddeed02724558096f0bb4508a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>> From: Haifeng Li
> >>> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:27:19 +0800
&
Haifeng wrote:
>> From d7cd78f9d71a5c9ddeed02724558096f0bb4508a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Haifeng Li
>> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:27:19 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] Fixup the page of buddy_higher address's calculation
>
> Some general questions:
> Any word ab
On Thu 23-08-12 16:40:13, Li Haifeng wrote:
> From d7cd78f9d71a5c9ddeed02724558096f0bb4508a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Haifeng Li
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:27:19 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Fixup the page of buddy_higher address's calculation
Some general questions:
A
7 matches
Mail list logo