Re: Format of patches

2014-05-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/15/2014 07:00 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15 May 2014 18:15, Mikulas Patocka wrote: --- >>> >>> Blurb here :) >> >> Sure - but if I want you to read "Blurb here :)" before reading the git >> message, I need to place it at the top of the email, before the git >> message. > > You can't,

Re: Format of patches (was: [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting)

2014-05-15 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 15 May 2014 18:15, Mikulas Patocka wrote: >> > --- >> >> Blurb here :) > > Sure - but if I want you to read "Blurb here :)" before reading the git > message, I need to place it at the top of the email, before the git > message. You can't, git will pick it up :) And people are trained enough t

Re: Format of patches (was: [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting)

2014-05-15 Thread Mikulas Patocka
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 15 May 2014 16:07, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > On Thu, 15 May 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> On 14 May 2014 19:54, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > >> > Hi Viresh > >> > > >> > Some times ago, I sent these two cpufreq patches to fix frequency > >> > transit

Re: Format of patches (was: [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting)

2014-05-15 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 15 May 2014 16:07, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 14 May 2014 19:54, Mikulas Patocka wrote: >> > Hi Viresh >> > >> > Some times ago, I sent these two cpufreq patches to fix frequency >> > transition problem on speedstep-smi, but you didn't put them to t

Format of patches (was: [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting)

2014-05-15 Thread Mikulas Patocka
On Thu, 15 May 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 14 May 2014 19:54, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > Hi Viresh > > > > Some times ago, I sent these two cpufreq patches to fix frequency > > transition problem on speedstep-smi, but you didn't put them to the > > upstream kernel. I am resending the patches