On 11/06/2013 03:31 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
watchdog device has to use it's own base address, clock source,
wdd device, so add new davinci_wdt_device structure to hold device
data.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk
On 11/06/2013 03:31 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
watchdog device has to use it's own base address, clock source,
wdd device, so add new davinci_wdt_device structure to hold device
data.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 11:27 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:37:04AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 06:31 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
>>> Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
>>> watchdog device has to use
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:37:04AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 06:31 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
> > Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
> > watchdog device has to use it's own base address, clock source,
> > wdd device, so add new
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 06:31 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
> Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
> watchdog device has to use it's own base address, clock source,
> wdd device, so add new davinci_wdt_device structure to hold device
In commit avoid struct names ;)
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 06:31 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
watchdog device has to use it's own base address, clock source,
wdd device, so add new davinci_wdt_device structure to hold device
In commit avoid struct names ;)
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:37:04AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 06:31 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
watchdog device has to use it's own base address, clock source,
wdd device, so add new
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 11:27 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:37:04AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 06:31 AM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
watchdog device has to use it's own
Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
watchdog device has to use it's own base address, clock source,
wdd device, so add new davinci_wdt_device structure to hold device
data.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk
---
drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c | 74
Some SoCs, like Keystone 2, can support more than one WDT and each
watchdog device has to use it's own base address, clock source,
wdd device, so add new davinci_wdt_device structure to hold device
data.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk ivan.khoronz...@ti.com
---
drivers/watchdog/davinci_wdt.c |
10 matches
Mail list logo
