On 11/03/2012 09:40 AM, Michal Zatloukal wrote:
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 04:33 -0700, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 21:09 +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote:
Your nice 19 tasks receiving 'too much' CPU when there are other
runnabl
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 04:33 -0700, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 21:09 +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote:
>>
>> > On the new kernel, the nice processes are never starved - even when
>> > starting a tab-laden chromium session, th
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 04:33 -0700, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 21:09 +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote:
>
> > On the new kernel, the nice processes are never starved - even when
> > starting a tab-laden chromium session, the processes for BOINC keep
> > about 20% CPU each (that is n
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 21:09 +0100, Michal Zatloukal wrote:
> On the new kernel, the nice processes are never starved - even when
> starting a tab-laden chromium session, the processes for BOINC keep
> about 20% CPU each (that is normalized to all CPUs, ie 40% nice load
> on each core). The problem
4 matches
Mail list logo