On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Martin Steigerwald
wrote:
> Am Samstag, 10. Januar 2015, 23:06:53 schrieb Al Viro:
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>> > > ... and this, boys and girls, is why quite a few of us have loathed udev
>> > > way before it got
On Sun 2015-01-11 10:04:26, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Samstag, 10. Januar 2015, 23:06:53 schrieb Al Viro:
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > > ... and this, boys and girls, is why quite a few of us have loathed udev
> > > > way before it got merged
Am Samstag, 10. Januar 2015, 23:06:53 schrieb Al Viro:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > > ... and this, boys and girls, is why quite a few of us have loathed udev
> > > way before it got merged into even nastier shitpile. Still do, for that
> > > matter.
>
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Martin Steigerwald
mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote:
Am Samstag, 10. Januar 2015, 23:06:53 schrieb Al Viro:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
... and this, boys and girls, is why quite a few of us have loathed udev
way before it
Am Samstag, 10. Januar 2015, 23:06:53 schrieb Al Viro:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
... and this, boys and girls, is why quite a few of us have loathed udev
way before it got merged into even nastier shitpile. Still do, for that
matter.
You
On Sun 2015-01-11 10:04:26, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Am Samstag, 10. Januar 2015, 23:06:53 schrieb Al Viro:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
... and this, boys and girls, is why quite a few of us have loathed udev
way before it got merged into even
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > ... and this, boys and girls, is why quite a few of us have loathed udev
> > way before it got merged into even nastier shitpile. Still do, for that
> > matter.
>
> You mean systemd by that?
Yes, I do. Has it been merged
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:18:05PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
> > > debugged version. Getting it
On Sat 2015-01-10 21:18:05, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
> > > debugged version. Getting it to
Am Samstag, 10. Januar 2015, 21:18:58 schrieb Al Viro:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:17:10AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > Yes, 3.18, please use that instead.
> > >
> > > Can't, sorry. My goal is to get 3.18/3.19 working, but I really need
> > > working kernel to debug userland (and then use that
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:17:10AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Yes, 3.18, please use that instead.
> >
> > Can't, sorry. My goal is to get 3.18/3.19 working, but I really need
> > working kernel to debug userland (and then use that userland to debug
> > kernel).
> >
> > > Seriously, lots of
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
> > debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
> > fun, but I
On 2015-01-10 19:09 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> I was hoping someone has devtmpfs patches I could just apply over
> 2.6.28 and get a working system?
IIRC the udev version in Debian 7 does not require devtmpfs (that became
mandatory only in udev 176), but kernel 2.6.32 or higher is required for
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
> debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
> fun, but I succeeded. Unfortunately, Debian 7's udev does not work
> with 2.6.28...
I guess
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 07:09:42PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sat 2015-01-10 10:05:32, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
> > > debugged version. Getting it to
On Sat 2015-01-10 10:05:32, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
> > debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
> > fun, but I succeeded. Unfortunately,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
> debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
> fun, but I succeeded. Unfortunately, Debian 7's udev does not work
> with 2.6.28...
>
>
Hi!
N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
fun, but I succeeded. Unfortunately, Debian 7's udev does not work
with 2.6.28...
Does anyone have kernel patches to enable modern udev?
Thanks,
Hi!
N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
fun, but I succeeded. Unfortunately, Debian 7's udev does not work
with 2.6.28...
Does anyone have kernel patches to enable modern udev?
Thanks,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
fun, but I succeeded.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:17:10AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Yes, 3.18, please use that instead.
Can't, sorry. My goal is to get 3.18/3.19 working, but I really need
working kernel to debug userland (and then use that userland to debug
kernel).
Seriously, lots of things have
On Sat 2015-01-10 10:05:32, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
fun, but I succeeded. Unfortunately, Debian 7's
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 07:09:42PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Sat 2015-01-10 10:05:32, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
debugged version. Getting it to compile on
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
fun, but I succeeded. Unfortunately, Debian 7's udev does not work
with 2.6.28...
I guess you
On 2015-01-10 19:09 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
I was hoping someone has devtmpfs patches I could just apply over
2.6.28 and get a working system?
IIRC the udev version in Debian 7 does not require devtmpfs (that became
mandatory only in udev 176), but kernel 2.6.32 or higher is required for
Am Samstag, 10. Januar 2015, 21:18:58 schrieb Al Viro:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:17:10AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Yes, 3.18, please use that instead.
Can't, sorry. My goal is to get 3.18/3.19 working, but I really need
working kernel to debug userland (and then use that userland to
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent distribution was
fun, but I succeeded. Unfortunately, Debian 7's udev does not work
with 2.6.28...
Does
On Sat 2015-01-10 21:18:05, Al Viro wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
debugged version. Getting it to compile on recent
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
... and this, boys and girls, is why quite a few of us have loathed udev
way before it got merged into even nastier shitpile. Still do, for that
matter.
You mean systemd by that?
Yes, I do. Has it been merged into any
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:18:05PM +, Al Viro wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 09:13:35PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
N900 has real problems on 3.19, and 2.6.28 should be very well
debugged version. Getting it to compile
30 matches
Mail list logo
