On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 10:22:44PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 20:05:21 +0200,
> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 2, 2016 12:07 PM, "Takashi Iwai" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 14:57:44 +0200,
> > > Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:05:43 +0200,
George Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 02/04/16 13:57, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:28:31 +0200,
> >> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>> If the former, could a we somehow detect an emulated device
On 02/04/16 13:57, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:28:31 +0200,
>> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> If the former, could a we somehow detect an emulated device other than
>>> through
>>> this type of check ? Or could we *add* a c
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 20:05:21 +0200,
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2016 12:07 PM, "Takashi Iwai" wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 14:57:44 +0200,
> > Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:28:31 +0200,
> > >
On Apr 2, 2016 12:07 PM, "Takashi Iwai" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 14:57:44 +0200,
> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:28:31 +0200,
> > > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >> If the former, could a we somehow detect an
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 14:57:44 +0200,
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:28:31 +0200,
> > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> If the former, could a we somehow detect an emulated device other than
> >> through
> >> this type of chec
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:28:31 +0200,
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> If the former, could a we somehow detect an emulated device other than
>> through
>> this type of check ? Or could we *add* a capability of some sort to detect it
>> on the dri
On Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:28:31 +0200,
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:34:10AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:26:18 +0200,
> > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:07:04AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:34:10AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:26:18 +0200,
> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:07:04AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:37:32 +0200,
> > > Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Would it be p
On Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:26:18 +0200,
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:07:04AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:37:32 +0200,
> > Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to revert:
> > >
> > > commit 228cf79376f13b98f2e1ac10586311312757675
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:07:04AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:37:32 +0200,
> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible to revert:
> >
> > commit 228cf79376f13b98f2e1ac10586311312757675c
> > Author: Konstantin Ozerkov
> > Date: Wed Oct 26 19:11:01 2011 +0400
>
On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:37:32 +0200,
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to revert:
>
> commit 228cf79376f13b98f2e1ac10586311312757675c
> Author: Konstantin Ozerkov
> Date: Wed Oct 26 19:11:01 2011 +0400
>
> ALSA: intel8x0: Improve performance in virtual environment
>
> Presum
Would it be possible to revert:
commit 228cf79376f13b98f2e1ac10586311312757675c
Author: Konstantin Ozerkov
Date: Wed Oct 26 19:11:01 2011 +0400
ALSA: intel8x0: Improve performance in virtual environment
Presumably one or more of the following is true:
a) The inside_vm == true case is jus
13 matches
Mail list logo