On May 23 2007 19:57, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>
>>> There you will notice that use of Linux KERNEL does not mean that
>>> your must publish sources for your proprietary application, or to
>>> make it easy for somebody to make a distribution
On 5/23/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
>> Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
>> their modifications public.
>
> They do for the kernel - they produce an "appliance".
Ah, I stand corrected.
>> WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essent
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> Alan Cox wrote:
[...]
> >They've quietly fed little bits back now and then but not made a big song
> >and dance about it. Hopefully with Andrew there and the like more will
> >occur.
>
> Strange that the NIC and SATA driver bits never seem to be among those
> "
Alan Cox wrote:
Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
their modifications public.
They do for the kernel - they produce an "appliance".
Ah, I stand corrected.
WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a closed source company.
They've quietly fed little
> Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
> their modifications public.
They do for the kernel - they produce an "appliance".
> WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a closed source company.
They've quietly fed little bits back now and then but not made a bi
Chris Malton wrote:
And where, may I ask, does one find the source of Google's modified
kernel? (At least, the unmodified bits!)
Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
their modifications public.
WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a closed source com
On May 23 2007 20:00, Gergo Szakal wrote:
>
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>> There you will notice that use of Linux KERNEL does not mean that
>> your must publish sources for your proprietary application, or to
>> make it easy for somebody to make a distribution competet
On Wed, 23 May 2007 19:52:20 +0300
Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> There you will notice that use of Linux KERNEL does not mean that
> your must publish sources for your proprietary application, or to
> make it easy for somebody to m
And copy to the list...
--- Begin Message ---
And where, may I ask, does one find the source of Google's modified
kernel? (At least, the unmodified bits!)
Chris
Matti Aarnio wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:50:35PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
El Wed, 23 May 2007 16:23:44 +0200, Gergo Sz
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:50:35PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Wed, 23 May 2007 16:23:44 +0200, Gergo Szakal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > Greetings to all list-members!
> >
> > Recently I have read that Google are selling enterprise hardware that
> > is running a modified version of t
El Wed, 23 May 2007 16:23:44 +0200, Gergo Szakal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Greetings to all list-members!
>
> Recently I have read that Google are selling enterprise hardware that
> is running a modified version of the Linuk kernel [1]. I decided to ask
> them whether the source is availabl
Greetings to all list-members!
Recently I have read that Google are selling enterprise hardware that
is running a modified version of the Linuk kernel [1]. I decided to ask
them whether the source is available. I did this via the question form
they offered.
Their officer told me that the source i
12 matches
Mail list logo
