On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> I suspect homepna is dead to be honest.
Apparently its competing rather well with DSL for MDU deployments (eg
hotels, apartment complexes)
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT
** Reply to message from Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 8 Jan 2001
23:54:16 + (GMT)
> I suspect homepna is dead to be honest.
I'm not so sure. My father-in-law just purchased a Gateway system with a
HomePNA device. It was the only networking device the computer came with.
It certai
> This doesn't seem to be the case with HomePNA 2.0 which makes me suspect
> that Broadcom has a patent on some critical piece of technology. I
Quite possible. Search for 'broadcom intel patent lawsuit' on google - there
are other outstanding things.
> can't think of any other reason how they s
I've been trying to search for a 10 Mpbs phone ethernet card that works
with linux. Apparently all of the products that implement HomePNA 2.0
use the Broadcom chipset and Broadcom has been extremely non-responsive
at providing chipset specifications.
The situation really irks me because the who
4 matches
Mail list logo
