rrect decision.
On Sun, 2/16/14, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
Subject: Re: Honestly, fork systemd
To: redl...@hush.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "debian-de...@lists.debian.org"
, debian-proj...@lists.debian.org, "ChaosEsque
No, I will not be converted to systemd just because a few dictators
made a decision.
This needs to be overturned by whoever actually runs the debian
non-profit corporation. I'm sure the tech-ctte isn't the board of
directors.
"Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be
like
No, I will not be converted to systemd just because a few dictators
made a decision.*
This needs to be overturned by whoever actually runs the debian
non-profit corporation. I'm sure the tech-ctte isn't the board of directors.
"Everyone then who hears these words of mine and does them will be li
The alternative is allready here. It's called SysV. Nothing needs to be done.
It is a rock on which to build.
Not a shifting sands.
I must say, I agree with the man of the New Testament on this particular
sort of issue. Build your house on rock, not on sand.
The alternative is allready in all of
On 16 February 2014 14:34, wrote:
> The alternative is allready here. It's called SysV. Nothing needs to be
> done.
> It is a rock on which to build.
> Not a shifting sands.
If you insist on alegories, then the choice now stands between
building on a solitary rock in the middle of a stormy sea o
5 matches
Mail list logo
