On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:38:42PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On 1/29/07, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
> >>
> >> e.g. how many downloads does it get?
> >
> > Are you including distros that
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:38:42PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Josh Boyer wrote:
On 1/29/07, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many downloads does it get?
Are you including distros that use it as well?
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:13:03PM +0300, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
> Hello
Hi Vladimir,
> On Wednesday 31 January 2007 10:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > reiserfs:
> > commit de14569f94513279e3d44d9571a421e9da1759ae
> > [PATCH] resierfs: avoid tail packing if an inode was ever mmapped
> >
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:13:03PM +0300, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Hello
Hi Vladimir,
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 10:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
...
reiserfs:
commit de14569f94513279e3d44d9571a421e9da1759ae
[PATCH] resierfs: avoid tail packing if an inode was ever mmapped
backport to
Hello
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 10:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> > >
> > > I believe our featherless leader said he though it was an ancient bug,
> > > exasperated by something
Hello
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 10:02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
I believe our featherless leader said he though it was an ancient bug,
exasperated by something that went into
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Regarding the longstanding CIFS/reiserfs/XFS problems, it seems the
> status is:
>
> CIFS:
> commit cb876f451455b6187a7d69de2c112c45ec4b7f99
> Fix up CIFS for "test_clear_page_dirty()" removal
> queued for 2.6.19.3
> applies and compiles against
David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:02:37AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The issue was somewhat confused by people certainly *reporting* it for
older kernels. Also, as part of the dirty bit cleanups and sanity
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:02:37AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > The issue was somewhat confused by people certainly *reporting* it for
> > older kernels. Also, as part of the dirty bit cleanups and sanity
> > checkingwe did
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:02:37AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> reiserfs:
> commit de14569f94513279e3d44d9571a421e9da1759ae
> [PATCH] resierfs: avoid tail packing if an inode was ever mmapped
> backport to 2.6.16 required
Which would explain the "notail" I've been careful to cargo-cult
into
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:02:37AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
reiserfs:
commit de14569f94513279e3d44d9571a421e9da1759ae
[PATCH] resierfs: avoid tail packing if an inode was ever mmapped
backport to 2.6.16 required
Which would explain the notail I've been careful to cargo-cult
into every
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:02:37AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The issue was somewhat confused by people certainly *reporting* it for
older kernels. Also, as part of the dirty bit cleanups and sanity
checkingwe did actually
David Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 08:02:37AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The issue was somewhat confused by people certainly *reporting* it for
older kernels. Also, as part of the dirty bit cleanups and sanity
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Regarding the longstanding CIFS/reiserfs/XFS problems, it seems the
status is:
CIFS:
commit cb876f451455b6187a7d69de2c112c45ec4b7f99
Fix up CIFS for test_clear_page_dirty() removal
queued for 2.6.19.3
applies and compiles against 2.6.16
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> >
> > I believe our featherless leader said he though it was an ancient bug,
> > exasperated by something that went into 2.6.19.
> >
> > If Linus's opinion is correct (still?), then
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> >
> > I believe our featherless leader said he though it was an ancient bug,
> > exasperated by something that went into 2.6.19.
> >
> > If Linus's opinion is correct (still?), then
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
>
> I believe our featherless leader said he though it was an ancient bug,
> exasperated by something that went into 2.6.19.
>
> If Linus's opinion is correct (still?), then the bug exists in all
> kernels since somewhere back in the 2.4.xx days.
The
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:52:15 +0100
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
> > I've been using Adrian's 2.6.16 kernel releases on two internet
> > servers that I look after remotely. One of them is RHEL 4 the
> > other is Fedora Core
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:13:00AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
We do a lot of Cyrus which does a lot of MMAP - and we also use the
Areca driver - which are both strong reasons to move to 2.6.19.2, but
if the MMAP fix was ported back to 2.6.16 we might consider staying
there
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:30:00 -0500
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
> >
> > e.g. how many downloads does it get?
>
> I've often wondered that myself,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:13:00AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:30:00 -0500
> > Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
> > >
> >
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:13:00AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:30:00 -0500
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:30:00 -0500
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many downloads does it get?
I've often wondered that myself, as I'm
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:13:00AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
We do a lot of Cyrus which does a lot of MMAP - and we also use the
Areca driver - which are both strong reasons to move to 2.6.19.2, but
if the MMAP fix was ported back to 2.6.16 we might consider staying
there
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:52:15 +0100
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
I've been using Adrian's 2.6.16 kernel releases on two internet
servers that I look after remotely. One of them is RHEL 4 the
other is Fedora Core 2 (Ensim
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
I believe our featherless leader said he though it was an ancient bug,
exasperated by something that went into 2.6.19.
If Linus's opinion is correct (still?), then the bug exists in all
kernels since somewhere back in the 2.4.xx days.
The issue was
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
I believe our featherless leader said he though it was an ancient bug,
exasperated by something that went into 2.6.19.
If Linus's opinion is correct (still?), then the bug exists
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:36:48PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
I believe our featherless leader said he though it was an ancient bug,
exasperated by something that went into 2.6.19.
If Linus's opinion is correct (still?), then the bug exists
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:30:00 -0500
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
> >
> > e.g. how many downloads does it get?
>
> I've often wondered that myself,
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:30:00 -0500
Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
>
> e.g. how many downloads does it get?
I've often wondered that myself, as I'm concerned for it to continue
to be maintained. I'm very appreciative
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On 1/29/07, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
>>
>> e.g. how many downloads does it get?
>
> Are you including distros that use it as well?
>
Yes, if they're based on Adrian's stable series.
-
To
On 1/29/07, Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many downloads does it get?
Are you including distros that use it as well?
josh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many downloads does it get?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many downloads does it get?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please
On 1/29/07, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many downloads does it get?
Are you including distros that use it as well?
josh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of
Josh Boyer wrote:
On 1/29/07, Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many downloads does it get?
Are you including distros that use it as well?
Yes, if they're based on Adrian's stable series.
-
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:30:00 -0500
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many downloads does it get?
I've often wondered that myself, as I'm concerned for it to continue
to be maintained. I'm very appreciative of
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:04:48PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:30:00 -0500
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to estimate the size of the user base for 2.6.16?
e.g. how many downloads does it get?
I've often wondered that myself, as I'm
38 matches
Mail list logo
