On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:11:15PM +0200, Markku Savela wrote:
> Solution found!
>
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Markku Savela wrote:
> > > If want to write a loadable module which "implements" a char device
> > > ("virtual", no real device present). How do I get the correct
> > >
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Markku Savela wrote:
> Thanks! The solution seems to work. The final *obstacle* was, that
> class_* symbols were not available until I added the
> LICENSE("GPL"). Here is the resulting template, maybe useful for
> someone, and just for verification, that I got it right.
> stat
Oops!
The error exits are not right in foo_init (need to release anything
succesfully created, if later operations fail). Probably need to make
the current foo_exit into foo_cleanup and call it in real foo_exit and
in any errors at foo_init.
But, again thanks for the help. I consider the "case cl
Solution found!
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Markku Savela wrote:
> > If want to write a loadable module which "implements" a char device
> > ("virtual", no real device present). How do I get the correct
> > "/dev/foo" to appear automaticly?
> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Markku Savela wrote:
>
> If want to write a loadable module which "implements" a char device
> ("virtual", no real device present). How do I get the correct
> "/dev/foo" to appear automaticly? What is the current recommended
> solution (kernel 2.6.17 in U
If want to write a loadable module which "implements" a char device
("virtual", no real device present). How do I get the correct
"/dev/foo" to appear automaticly? What is the current recommended
solution (kernel 2.6.17 in Ubuntu and later).
static int major;
static int __init foo_init(void)
6 matches
Mail list logo
