On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:31:43PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> So my question is, what is there against moving some of the constrants
> before the always-on, so that the enable can atleast function properly
> according to its parameters?
No, and in general please don't ask to send patches -
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:31:43PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> So my question is, what is there against moving some of the constrants
> before the always-on, so that the enable can atleast function properly
> according to its parameters?
No, and in general please don't ask to send patches -
Hey all,
Sorry for top-posting, but I did not want to break the thread, while the
initial mail does provide background information.
So I've implemented a software-based soft-start in the regulator_enable
function of the axp209. This works as expected. Whether it is the right
solution I'll
Hey all,
Sorry for top-posting, but I did not want to break the thread, while the
initial mail does provide background information.
So I've implemented a software-based soft-start in the regulator_enable
function of the axp209. This works as expected. Whether it is the right
solution I'll
Hey all,
We found a bug in the design of a board that we use. This board (Olimex
OLinuXino Lime2) features a PMIC (AXP209) and has an LDO, LDO3, that
needs special treatment.
The bug is, that there is too much capacitance on the output of LDO3,
which causes the PMIC to shutdown when
Hey all,
We found a bug in the design of a board that we use. This board (Olimex
OLinuXino Lime2) features a PMIC (AXP209) and has an LDO, LDO3, that
needs special treatment.
The bug is, that there is too much capacitance on the output of LDO3,
which causes the PMIC to shutdown when
6 matches
Mail list logo
