On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
>
> at http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/lxr/source/include/linux/mm.h#L561
> Should the comment be s/page_mapped/page->mapping/ ?
No.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Magnus Damm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The majority of pages I am seeing no longer have page->mapping set. Does
> > > > this mean
On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Magnus Damm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The majority of pages I am seeing no longer have page-mapping set. Does
this mean they are in the process
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
at http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/lxr/source/include/linux/mm.h#L561
Should the comment be s/page_mapped/page-mapping/ ?
No.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Magnus Damm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The majority of pages I am seeing no longer have page->mapping set. Does
> > > > this mean
Magnus Damm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The majority of pages I am seeing no longer have page->mapping set. Does
> > > this mean they are in the process of being cleared up?
> >
> > They're
On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The majority of pages I am seeing no longer have page->mapping set. Does
> > this mean they are in the process of being cleared up?
>
> They're just anonymous pages, aren't they? But you said "pages
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 18:27 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > I later linearly scan the mem_map looking for pages that can be freed up
> > (usually LRU pages). I was expecting any page with PG_inode set to have a
> > page->mapping but not all of them do. It is
Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well there are conditions in which mmapped file pages can get converted to
> > anonymous pages due to truncate(), but I have a feeling that we stopped
> > that from happening.
> >
>
> Does that also apply to when a file is unlinked rather than
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 18:27 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> I later linearly scan the mem_map looking for pages that can be freed up
> (usually LRU pages). I was expecting any page with PG_inode set to have a
> page->mapping but not all of them do. It is the pages without a ->mapping
> that are
Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am working on a
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
> > > >
Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
> > > contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
> > contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding a
> > hundreds of pages that are being used for inodes
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding a
hundreds of pages that are being used for inodes that I need to
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding a
hundreds of pages
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
contiguous pages. The part I have is
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 18:27 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
I later linearly scan the mem_map looking for pages that can be freed up
(usually LRU pages). I was expecting any page with PG_inode set to have a
page-mapping but not all of them do. It is the pages without a -mapping
that are confusing the
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well there are conditions in which mmapped file pages can get converted to
anonymous pages due to truncate(), but I have a feeling that we stopped
that from happening.
Does that also apply to when a file is unlinked rather than truncated?
Yup.
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 18:27 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
I later linearly scan the mem_map looking for pages that can be freed up
(usually LRU pages). I was expecting any page with PG_inode set to have a
page-mapping but not all of them do. It is the
On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The majority of pages I am seeing no longer have page-mapping set. Does
this mean they are in the process of being cleared up?
They're just anonymous pages, aren't they? But you said pages that are
Magnus Damm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The majority of pages I am seeing no longer have page-mapping set. Does
this mean they are in the process of being cleared up?
They're just anonymous pages,
On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Magnus Damm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/11/05, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The majority of pages I am seeing no longer have page-mapping set. Does
this mean they are in the process
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Given a struct page, that one knows is an inode, can anyone suggest
> the best way to find the inode using it and free it?
Note that you can only free the inodes that aren't currently
open files for any of the processes in the system.
--
All Rights
Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
> contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding a
> hundreds of pages that are being used for inodes that I need to reclaim. I
> tried purging the inode
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Mon, 8 August 2005 16:52:52 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
> > I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
> > contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding a
> > hundreds of pages that are being used for
On Mon, 8 August 2005 16:52:52 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
> contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding a
> hundreds of pages that are being used for inodes that I need to reclaim. I
> tried purging the
On Mon, 8 August 2005 16:52:52 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding a
hundreds of pages that are being used for inodes that I need to reclaim. I
tried purging the
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Jörn Engel wrote:
On Mon, 8 August 2005 16:52:52 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding a
hundreds of pages that are being used for inodes that I
Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am working on a direct reclaim strategy to free up large blocks of
contiguous pages. The part I have is working fine, but I am finding a
hundreds of pages that are being used for inodes that I need to reclaim. I
tried purging the inode lists using
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Mel Gorman wrote:
Given a struct page, that one knows is an inode, can anyone suggest
the best way to find the inode using it and free it?
Note that you can only free the inodes that aren't currently
open files for any of the processes in the system.
--
All Rights
34 matches
Mail list logo
