Re: Hung Port

2007-01-17 Thread Lawrence MacIntyre
After checking >> everything I could think of, I rebooted it, and there were no ports that >> were unavailable in this way when it came back up. This morning another >> hung port has appeared (TCP:43355). My best guess is that this is an >> ephemeral port that

Re: Hung Port

2007-01-17 Thread Jan Engelhardt
could think of, I rebooted it, and there were no ports that >were unavailable in this way when it came back up. This morning another >hung port has appeared (TCP:43355). My best guess is that this is an >ephemeral port that has somehow gotten hung in the kernel somew

Hung Port

2007-01-17 Thread Lawrence MacIntyre
it came back up. This morning another hung port has appeared (TCP:43355). My best guess is that this is an ephemeral port that has somehow gotten hung in the kernel somewhere. Has anyone seen anything like this and/or is there anything else I could look at to figure it out? -- Lawrence

Hung Port

2007-01-17 Thread Lawrence MacIntyre
it came back up. This morning another hung port has appeared (TCP:43355). My best guess is that this is an ephemeral port that has somehow gotten hung in the kernel somewhere. Has anyone seen anything like this and/or is there anything else I could look at to figure it out? -- Lawrence

Re: Hung Port

2007-01-17 Thread Jan Engelhardt
it, and there were no ports that were unavailable in this way when it came back up. This morning another hung port has appeared (TCP:43355). My best guess is that this is an ephemeral port that has somehow gotten hung in the kernel somewhere. Has anyone seen anything like this and/or is there anything else I

Re: Hung Port

2007-01-17 Thread Lawrence MacIntyre
that were unavailable in this way when it came back up. This morning another hung port has appeared (TCP:43355). My best guess is that this is an ephemeral port that has somehow gotten hung in the kernel somewhere. Has anyone seen anything like this and/or is there anything else I could look