Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> >> I don't think so but I could be wrong. When "Configure SATA as" was set to
> >> "IDE" the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as
> >> /dev/sda.
> >> The only
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
I don't think so but I could be wrong. When Configure SATA as was set to
IDE the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as
/dev/sda.
The only visible difference
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
I don't think so but I could be wrong. When "Configure SATA as" was set to
"IDE" the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda.
The only visible difference the change to "AHCI" made
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> I don't think so but I could be wrong. When "Configure SATA as" was set to
> "IDE" the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda.
> The only visible difference the change to "AHCI" made was that instead of
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
I don't think so but I could be wrong. When Configure SATA as was set to
IDE the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda.
The only visible difference the change to AHCI made was that instead of
the
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:21:57AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
I don't think so but I could be wrong. When Configure SATA as was set to
IDE the HDD was being detected as a SATA drive and showed up as /dev/sda.
The only visible difference the change to AHCI made was
Len Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:37:21AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases.
> >
> > It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a
> > combination of issues.
> >
> > 1) This board uses a Marvell PATA
Len Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:37:21AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases.
It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a
combination of issues.
1) This board uses a Marvell PATA controller,
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:37:21AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases.
>
> It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a
> combination of issues.
>
> 1) This board uses a Marvell PATA controller, so the relevant driver
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:37:21AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
The CDROM was showing up in the POST in all cases.
It turns out the problem (as I outlined in a followup post) resulted from a
combination of issues.
1) This board uses a Marvell PATA controller, so the relevant driver must
Hi Bill
> > A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
> > (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
> > CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
> > problems.
> >
> Let me belatedly ask if the device shows
Hi Bill
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
(DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
problems.
Let me belatedly ask if the device shows up in POST
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
(DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
problems.
Let me belatedly ask if the device shows up in
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
(DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
problems.
Let me belatedly ask if the device shows up in
Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
just curious, what makes you think that AHCI is better wrt performance?
NCQ support, CPU cycle savings, no silly DMA limits (supports larger
clustered chunks of data, less bouncing), supports 64-bit (no bouncing
on 64-bit), eliminates use of PIO, the list goes on.
Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS
> settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the
> controller into AHCI mode for best performance.
Hi,
just curious, what makes you think that AHCI is better wrt
Robert Hancock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, it's unrelated to this problem, but you should check the BIOS
settings for the SATA controller - you really want to get the
controller into AHCI mode for best performance.
Hi,
just curious, what makes you think that AHCI is better wrt
Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
just curious, what makes you think that AHCI is better wrt performance?
NCQ support, CPU cycle savings, no silly DMA limits (supports larger
clustered chunks of data, less bouncing), supports 64-bit (no bouncing
on 64-bit), eliminates use of PIO, the list goes on.
> > Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just
> > booted has this set to "y" (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not
> > detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel
> > was 2.6.22-rc2.
>
> Should be current. Its known to work fine
> Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just
> booted has this set to "y" (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not
> detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel
> was 2.6.22-rc2.
Should be current. Its known to work fine for that chip
> > 02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device
> > 6101 (rev b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem:
> > Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 Flags: bus master,
> > fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 10
> :
> Looks like you've got Marvell IDE for
On Monday, May 21, 2007 4:05 pm Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> 02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device
> 6101 (rev b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem:
> Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 Flags: bus master,
> fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 10
This would be your PATA port - pata_marvell.
> 02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 (rev
> b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO])
> Subsystem: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101
> Does this apply to *all* SATA controllers or just
> Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under
> > the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except
> > those labelled "highly experimental"). As far as I can tell the
> > CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even
O> What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as
> "n port SATA" controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a
> PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though.
Later ICH is listed by the documentation I have as SATA only. I would
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under
the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except
those labelled "highly experimental"). As far as I can tell the
CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even with all these
> Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
> > (DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
> > CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
> > problems.
> >
> > Relevant parts from
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
(DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
problems.
Relevant parts from lspci:
00:1f.2 0101:
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
(DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
problems.
Relevant parts from lspci:
00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2820 (rev 02)
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
(DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
problems.
Relevant parts from lspci:
00:1f.2 0101: 8086:2820 (rev 02)
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
(DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
problems.
Relevant parts from lspci:
00:1f.2 0101:
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
A collegue of mine has an Intel mainboard with the i865 chipset onboard
(DQ965). All kernels up to and including 2.6.22-rc2 do not detect the IDE
CDROM/DVDROM when booting. The SATA hard drive is found without any
problems.
Relevant parts from lspci:
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under
the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except
those labelled highly experimental). As far as I can tell the
CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even with all these
O What's interesting here is that 00:1f.2 and 00:1f.5 are both identified as
n port SATA controllers even though one of them (I suspect 00:1f.5) is a
PATA controller. This may just be a typo in lspci's database though.
Later ICH is listed by the documentation I have as SATA only. I would
This would be your PATA port - pata_marvell.
02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 (rev
b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO])
Subsystem: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101
Does this apply to *all* SATA controllers or just these
On Monday, May 21, 2007 4:05 pm Jonathan Woithe wrote:
02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device
6101 (rev b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem:
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 Flags: bus master,
fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 10
Jonathan Woithe wrote:
I've just tried a quick test after enabling most of the PATA drivers under
the libata section including the Jmicron driver (basically everything except
those labelled highly experimental). As far as I can tell the
CDROM/DVDROM is still not detected even with all
02:00.0 IDE interface: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device
6101 (rev b1) (prog-if 8f [Master SecP SecO PriP PriO]) Subsystem:
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Unknown device 6101 Flags: bus master,
fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 10
:
Looks like you've got Marvell IDE for your PATA
Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just
booted has this set to y (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not
detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel
was 2.6.22-rc2.
Should be current. Its known to work fine for that chip so
Are we talking CONFIG_PATA_MARVELL here? If so then the kernel I just
booted has this set to y (ie: built-in) and yet the drive is still not
detected. Is there a newer version of this driver somewhere? The kernel
was 2.6.22-rc2.
Should be current. Its known to work fine for that chip
40 matches
Mail list logo
