Re: IMS Twin Turbo 128 framebuffer

2001-03-03 Thread Bruce Harada
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:32:31 -0300 John R Lenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any particular reason why imsttfb isn't available in the > i386 arch? I believe it's because the Twin Turbo was introduced into the kernel via the PPC kernel port - was there actually a TT board for PCs? I'm

Re: IMS Twin Turbo 128 framebuffer

2001-03-03 Thread Bruce Harada
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:32:31 -0300 John R Lenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any particular reason why imsttfb isn't available in the i386 arch? I believe it's because the Twin Turbo was introduced into the kernel via the PPC kernel port - was there actually a TT board for PCs? I'm not

IMS Twin Turbo 128 framebuffer

2001-03-02 Thread John R Lenton
Is there any particular reason why imsttfb isn't available in the i386 arch? It doesn't work in X either in spite of being "supported", but that's not for this list. -- John Lenton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Random fortune: Le donne hanno 4 labbra: due per dire delle stupidaggini, due per farsi

IMS Twin Turbo 128 framebuffer

2001-03-02 Thread John R Lenton
Is there any particular reason why imsttfb isn't available in the i386 arch? It doesn't work in X either in spite of being "supported", but that's not for this list. -- John Lenton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Random fortune: Le donne hanno 4 labbra: due per dire delle stupidaggini, due per farsi