Re: IRQ handling difference between i386 and x86_64

2007-07-02 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: Hello, It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64. In my

Re: IRQ handling difference between i386 and x86_64

2007-07-02 Thread Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: >> Hello, >> >> It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64. >> >> In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading >> over all CPUs. This a single CPU, four CO

Re: IRQ handling difference between i386 and x86_64

2007-07-01 Thread Chris Snook
Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: Hello, It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64. In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading over all

Re: IRQ handling difference between i386 and x86_64

2007-06-30 Thread Krzysztof Oledzki
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: Hello, It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64. In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading over all CPUs. This a single CPU,

Re: IRQ handling difference between i386 and x86_64

2007-06-30 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: > Hello, > > It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64. > > In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading > over all CPUs. This a single CPU, four CORE system (Quad-Core E5335 Xeon