Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
Hello,
It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64.
In my
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64.
>>
>> In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading
>> over all CPUs. This a single CPU, four CO
Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
Hello,
It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64.
In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading
over all
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
Hello,
It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64.
In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading
over all CPUs. This a single CPU,
On Sat, 2007-06-30 at 16:55 +0200, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that IRQ handling is somehow different between i386 and x86_64.
>
> In my Dell PowerEdge 1950 is it possible to enable interrupts spreading
> over all CPUs. This a single CPU, four CORE system (Quad-Core E5335 Xeon
5 matches
Mail list logo