Re: Improved UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt10

Ingo, Here are some more results: Nvidia w/cyclesoak 2.6.21-rc5-rt10 938 32% netperf @51 hardirq @50 softirq @50 Nvidia w/top 2.6.21-rc5-rt12 938 31% netperf @51 hardirq @50 softirq @50 Hopefully I'll run some more tests in the

Re: Improved UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt10

Ingo, Here are some more results: Nvidia w/cyclesoak 2.6.21-rc5-rt10 938 32% netperf @51 hardirq @50 softirq @50 Nvidia w/top 2.6.21-rc5-rt12 938 31% netperf @51 hardirq @50 softirq @50 Hopefully I'll run some more tests in the

Re: Improved UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt10

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > rt10 shows a big improvement over rt8 > > ## > etupThruput CPU% > Nvidia > 2.6.21-rc5-rt8 938 65% >netperf @51 >hardirq @50 >softirq @50 > >

Re: Improved UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt10

rt10 shows a big improvement over rt8 ## etupThruput CPU% Nvidia 2.6.21-rc5-rt8 938 65% netperf @51 hardirq @50 softirq @50 Nvidia 2.6.21-rc5-rt10 938 32% netperf @51

Re: Improved UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt10

rt10 shows a big improvement over rt8 ## etupThruput CPU% Nvidia 2.6.21-rc5-rt8 938 65% netperf @51 hardirq @50 softirq @50 Nvidia 2.6.21-rc5-rt10 938 32% netperf @51

Re: Improved UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt10

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rt10 shows a big improvement over rt8 ## etupThruput CPU% Nvidia 2.6.21-rc5-rt8 938 65% netperf @51 hardirq @50 softirq @50 Nvidia