On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:07:29AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> Sorry for the slow follow-up.
>
> On 14 November 2017 at 17:16, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> >
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:07:29AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
>
> Sorry for the slow follow-up.
>
> On 14 November 2017 at 17:16, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Miklos, Ram
> >>
> >> Thanks
Hello Miklos,
On 20 November 2017 at 10:22, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> wrote:
>
>> But, the problem is that the existing description is at best misleading:
>>
>> (2) parent
Hello Miklos,
On 20 November 2017 at 10:22, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> wrote:
>
>> But, the problem is that the existing description is at best misleading:
>>
>> (2) parent ID: the ID of the parent mount (or of self
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> But, the problem is that the existing description is at best misleading:
>
> (2) parent ID: the ID of the parent mount (or of self for
>the top of the mount tree).
>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> But, the problem is that the existing description is at best misleading:
>
> (2) parent ID: the ID of the parent mount (or of self for
>the top of the mount tree).
>
> That implies that
Hi Miklos,
Sorry for the slow follow-up.
On 14 November 2017 at 17:16, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> wrote:
>> Hi Miklos, Ram
>>
>> Thanks for your comments. A question below.
>>
>> On 13
Hi Miklos,
Sorry for the slow follow-up.
On 14 November 2017 at 17:16, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> wrote:
>> Hi Miklos, Ram
>>
>> Thanks for your comments. A question below.
>>
>> On 13 November 2017 at 09:11, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hi Miklos, Ram
>
> Thanks for your comments. A question below.
>
> On 13 November 2017 at 09:11, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ram Pai
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hi Miklos, Ram
>
> Thanks for your comments. A question below.
>
> On 13 November 2017 at 09:11, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:02:21AM +0100, Michael
Hi Miklos, Ram
Thanks for your comments. A question below.
On 13 November 2017 at 09:11, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:02:21AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>>> Hello
Hi Miklos, Ram
Thanks for your comments. A question below.
On 13 November 2017 at 09:11, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:02:21AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>>> Hello Ram,
>>>
>>> Long ago (2.6.29) you added
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:02:21AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hello Ram,
>>
>> Long ago (2.6.29) you added the /proc/PID/mountinfo file and
>> associated documentation in Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:02:21AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hello Ram,
>>
>> Long ago (2.6.29) you added the /proc/PID/mountinfo file and
>> associated documentation in Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt. Later,
>> I pasted
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:02:21AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Ram,
>
> Long ago (2.6.29) you added the /proc/PID/mountinfo file and
> associated documentation in Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt. Later,
> I pasted much of that documentation into the proc(5) manual page.
>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 07:02:21AM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hello Ram,
>
> Long ago (2.6.29) you added the /proc/PID/mountinfo file and
> associated documentation in Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt. Later,
> I pasted much of that documentation into the proc(5) manual page.
>
Hello Ram,
Long ago (2.6.29) you added the /proc/PID/mountinfo file and
associated documentation in Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt. Later,
I pasted much of that documentation into the proc(5) manual page.
That documentation says of the second field in the file:
[[
This file contains lines
Hello Ram,
Long ago (2.6.29) you added the /proc/PID/mountinfo file and
associated documentation in Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt. Later,
I pasted much of that documentation into the proc(5) manual page.
That documentation says of the second field in the file:
[[
This file contains lines
18 matches
Mail list logo