Re: Improving mmap() support for !MMU further

David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Linus, > > I'd like to improve mmap() support on !MMU still further by overloading struct > backing_dev_info::memory_backed to hold flags describing what the backing > device is capable of with respect to direct memory access. ->memory_backed is

Improving mmap() support for !MMU further

Hi Linus, I'd like to improve mmap() support on !MMU still further by overloading struct backing_dev_info::memory_backed to hold flags describing what the backing device is capable of with respect to direct memory access. (*) If bdi->memory_backed is 0, then the backing device is not

Improving mmap() support for !MMU further

Hi Linus, I'd like to improve mmap() support on !MMU still further by overloading struct backing_dev_info::memory_backed to hold flags describing what the backing device is capable of with respect to direct memory access. (*) If bdi-memory_backed is 0, then the backing device is not accessible

Re: Improving mmap() support for !MMU further

David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Linus, I'd like to improve mmap() support on !MMU still further by overloading struct backing_dev_info::memory_backed to hold flags describing what the backing device is capable of with respect to direct memory access. -memory_backed is already