Casey Schaufler wrote:
--- "Z. Cliffe Schreuders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I need is to ignore double delimiters such as (::). This can be
done trivially with a string comparison to check for "\0". What I want
to know is if it is ok to include the strtok_r code in my security
module
--- "Z. Cliffe Schreuders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I need is to ignore double delimiters such as (::). This can be
> done trivially with a string comparison to check for "\0". What I want
> to know is if it is ok to include the strtok_r code in my security
> module, or if strtok was
What I need is to ignore double delimiters such as (::). This can be
done trivially with a string comparison to check for "\0". What I want
to know is if it is ok to include the strtok_r code in my security
module, or if strtok was removed for a very good reason. I am porting a
lot of existing
On Jul 16 2007 16:52, Z. Cliffe Schreuders wrote:
>
> I am aware strtok was removed from the kernel in 2002. However strtok_r is
> more
> desirable than strsep as I do not want to know about 'blank fields' (2
> consecutive delimiters). Is it acceptable to simply include the strtok_r code
> in my
I am aware strtok was removed from the kernel in 2002. However strtok_r
is more desirable than strsep as I do not want to know about 'blank
fields' (2 consecutive delimiters). Is it acceptable to simply include
the strtok_r code in my security module? or should I create a wrapper
for strsep to
5 matches
Mail list logo
