Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:43:52 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> The patches in my next queue are fully reviewed and (should) have seen
> at least basic testing. The additional QA on top is just normal
> regression testing and about every 2 weeks a manual testing cycle for
> things like
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:19:53 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >
>> > Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
>> > weeks worth
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:19:53 +0100 Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:43:52 +0100 Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
The patches in my next queue are fully reviewed and (should) have seen
at least basic testing. The additional QA on top is just normal
regression testing and about every 2 weeks a manual testing cycle
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:19:53 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
> > weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking
> > everyone's
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 15:19 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > Hi Steven,
>> >
>> > Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
>> > weeks worth of
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 15:19 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Hi Steven,
> >
> > Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
> > weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking
> > everyone's
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
> weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking
> everyone's tree when things land in Dave's drm-next. But that also
> means we'll
Hi Steven,
Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking
everyone's tree when things land in Dave's drm-next. But that also
means we'll miss out a bit in the integration testing -next provides,
which did hurt a
Hi Steven,
Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking
everyone's tree when things land in Dave's drm-next. But that also
means we'll miss out a bit in the integration testing -next provides,
which did hurt a
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Hi Steven,
Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking
everyone's tree when things land in Dave's drm-next. But that also
means we'll miss
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 15:19 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Hi Steven,
Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking
everyone's tree when
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 15:19 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Hi Steven,
Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
weeks worth of
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:19:53 +0100 Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:12:02PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Since about a year ago we've switched drm/i915 to buffer around 2
weeks worth of patches so that we can do decent QA before breaking
14 matches
Mail list logo
