On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:01:11AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:52:54 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> > > Hi all...
> > >
> > > I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:52:54 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> > Hi all...
> >
> > I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
> > (as I recall many discussions about inlining yes or
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
> (as I recall many discussions about inlining yes or no...).
>
> Testing other problems, I finally got this this issue: the same short
> and
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Hi all...
I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
(as I recall many discussions about inlining yes or no...).
Testing other problems, I finally got this this issue: the same short
and stupid
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:52:54 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Hi all...
I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
(as I recall many discussions about inlining yes or no...).
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:01:11AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:52:54 +0200, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Hi all...
I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> It looks like is updating the stack on each iteration...This is -march=opteron
> code, the -march=pentium4 is similar. Same behaviour with gcc3 and gcc4.
>
> tst.c and Makefile attached.
>
> Nice, isn't it ? Please, probe where is
Hi all...
I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
(as I recall many discussions about inlining yes or no...).
Testing other problems, I finally got this this issue: the same short
and stupid loop lasted from 3 to 5 times more if it was in main() than
if it was in
Hi all...
I post this here as it can be of direct interest for kernel development
(as I recall many discussions about inlining yes or no...).
Testing other problems, I finally got this this issue: the same short
and stupid loop lasted from 3 to 5 times more if it was in main() than
if it was in
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:18:38AM +0200, J.A. Magallón wrote:
It looks like is updating the stack on each iteration...This is -march=opteron
code, the -march=pentium4 is similar. Same behaviour with gcc3 and gcc4.
tst.c and Makefile attached.
Nice, isn't it ? Please, probe where is my
10 matches
Mail list logo
