On 10/11/18 2:40 PM, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 07:14:30AM -0700, h...@zytor.com wrote:
>>>
>>> I mean - what is the baud rate of a pty ?
>>
>> Whatever the master wants it to be...
>
> I think Alan's point is that it is highly unlikely you would be able
> to push the
On 10/11/18 2:40 PM, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 07:14:30AM -0700, h...@zytor.com wrote:
>>>
>>> I mean - what is the baud rate of a pty ?
>>
>> Whatever the master wants it to be...
>
> I think Alan's point is that it is highly unlikely you would be able
> to push the
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 07:14:30AM -0700, h...@zytor.com wrote:
> >
> >I mean - what is the baud rate of a pty ?
>
> Whatever the master wants it to be...
I think Alan's point is that it is highly unlikely you would be able
to push the equivalent of 4 gbps through a PTY layer. The TTY later
was
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 07:14:30AM -0700, h...@zytor.com wrote:
> >
> >I mean - what is the baud rate of a pty ?
>
> Whatever the master wants it to be...
I think Alan's point is that it is highly unlikely you would be able
to push the equivalent of 4 gbps through a PTY layer. The TTY later
was
On 18.10.11, Alan Cox wrote:
> I mean - what is the baud rate of a pty ?
Solaris made the distinction between B0, which means pty hangup mode,
and any other baud rate:
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E88353_01/html/E37851/pty-4d.html
But... why not implement a pty bandwidth
On 18.10.11, Alan Cox wrote:
> I mean - what is the baud rate of a pty ?
Solaris made the distinction between B0, which means pty hangup mode,
and any other baud rate:
https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E88353_01/html/E37851/pty-4d.html
But... why not implement a pty bandwidth
On 10/11/18 12:36 PM, Craig Milo Rogers wrote:
> On 18.10.11, Alan Cox wrote:
>> I mean - what is the baud rate of a pty ?
>
> Solaris made the distinction between B0, which means pty hangup mode,
> and any other baud rate:
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E88353_01/html/E37851/pty-4d.html
On 10/11/18 12:36 PM, Craig Milo Rogers wrote:
> On 18.10.11, Alan Cox wrote:
>> I mean - what is the baud rate of a pty ?
>
> Solaris made the distinction between B0, which means pty hangup mode,
> and any other baud rate:
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E88353_01/html/E37851/pty-4d.html
On October 11, 2018 5:31:34 AM PDT, Alan Cox wrote:
>> I'm mostly wondering if it is worth future-proofing for new
>transports. It sounds like we can have a consensus on leaving the upper
>4 bits of the speed fields reserved, but leave the details of
>implementation for the future?
>
>It seems
On October 11, 2018 5:31:34 AM PDT, Alan Cox wrote:
>> I'm mostly wondering if it is worth future-proofing for new
>transports. It sounds like we can have a consensus on leaving the upper
>4 bits of the speed fields reserved, but leave the details of
>implementation for the future?
>
>It seems
> I'm mostly wondering if it is worth future-proofing for new transports. It
> sounds like we can have a consensus on leaving the upper 4 bits of the speed
> fields reserved, but leave the details of implementation for the future?
It seems reasonable, although I think the reality is that any
> I'm mostly wondering if it is worth future-proofing for new transports. It
> sounds like we can have a consensus on leaving the upper 4 bits of the speed
> fields reserved, but leave the details of implementation for the future?
It seems reasonable, although I think the reality is that any
On October 10, 2018 1:17:17 PM PDT, Alan Cox wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:19:04 -0700
>"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>
>> [Resending to a wider audience]
>>
>> In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in
>glibc,
>> the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in
On October 10, 2018 1:17:17 PM PDT, Alan Cox wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:19:04 -0700
>"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
>
>> [Resending to a wider audience]
>>
>> In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in
>glibc,
>> the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:19:04 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> [Resending to a wider audience]
>
> In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in glibc,
> the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in excess of
> 4 Gbps, even in the relatively remote future.
Even
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:19:04 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" wrote:
> [Resending to a wider audience]
>
> In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in glibc,
> the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in excess of
> 4 Gbps, even in the relatively remote future.
Even
On 10/09/18 12:51, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:19:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> [Resending to a wider audience]
>>
>> In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in glibc,
>> the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in excess of
>> 4
On 10/09/18 12:51, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:19:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> [Resending to a wider audience]
>>
>> In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in glibc,
>> the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in excess of
>> 4
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:19:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> [Resending to a wider audience]
>
> In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in glibc,
> the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in excess of
> 4 Gbps, even in the relatively remote future.
>
On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:19:04PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> [Resending to a wider audience]
>
> In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in glibc,
> the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in excess of
> 4 Gbps, even in the relatively remote future.
>
[Resending to a wider audience]
In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in glibc,
the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in excess of
4 Gbps, even in the relatively remote future.
If this is something we care about *at all*, I would like to suggest
that
[Resending to a wider audience]
In trying to get the termios2 interface actually implemented in glibc,
the question came up if we will ever care about baud rates in excess of
4 Gbps, even in the relatively remote future.
If this is something we care about *at all*, I would like to suggest
that
22 matches
Mail list logo
