Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-03-06 Thread Justin Piszcz
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 10:57 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hi, Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which

Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-03-06 Thread Justin Piszcz
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 10:57 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hi, Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which

Re: Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-02-05 Thread Justin Piszcz
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 10:57 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hi, Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which is used on 965 (and possibly other?) chipsets.

Re: Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-02-05 Thread Justin Piszcz
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 10:57 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hi, Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which is used on 965 (and possibly other?) chipsets.

Re: Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-02-04 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 10:57 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what > is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which is used > on 965 (and possibly other?) chipsets. I asked the right folks and the word

Re: Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-02-04 Thread Joseph Pingenot
>From Justin Piszcz on Sunday, 04 February, 2007: >Hi, >Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what >is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which is used >on 965 (and possibly other?) chipsets. I am not from Intel, but the article at

Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-02-04 Thread Justin Piszcz
Hi, Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which is used on 965 (and possibly other?) chipsets. I bought an Intel board, thinking everything would be supported, because it is an Intel board. The

Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-02-04 Thread Justin Piszcz
Hi, Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which is used on 965 (and possibly other?) chipsets. I bought an Intel board, thinking everything would be supported, because it is an Intel board. The

Re: Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-02-04 Thread Joseph Pingenot
From Justin Piszcz on Sunday, 04 February, 2007: Hi, Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which is used on 965 (and possibly other?) chipsets. I am not from Intel, but the article at

Re: Intel chooses not to support its HECI/QPS Chip in Linux?

2007-02-04 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 10:57 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hi, Anyone from Intel that reads LKML, could you provide an update as to what is happening with support for your HECI Controller/QPS chip, which is used on 965 (and possibly other?) chipsets. I asked the right folks and the word I