On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 02:11:27PM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> >>Is there any T/TCP patch for kernel 2.2.16? thanks.
> >
> > Maybe, but you don't want it. T/TCP is inherently insecure.
>
> Within a cluster though, T/TCP could be useful. What about
> enabling it on trusted interfaces?
T
>> Is there any T/TCP patch for kernel 2.2.16? thanks.
>
> Maybe, but you don't want it. T/TCP is inherently insecure.
Within a cluster though, T/TCP could be useful. What about
enabling it on trusted interfaces?
Example: there are a few dozen boxes using eth0 and eth1 for
each other. One o
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Mao Yun wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Is there any T/TCP patch for kernel 2.2.16? thanks.
> Maybe, but you don't want it. T/TCP is inherently insecure.
There are cases that doesn't matter and people interested in fixing T/TCP to
do the subset of things it can do and do them we
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Mao Yun wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is there any T/TCP patch for kernel 2.2.16? thanks.
Maybe, but you don't want it. T/TCP is inherently insecure.
--
"Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li
Hi all,
Is there any T/TCP patch for kernel 2.2.16? thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
5 matches
Mail list logo