On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 3:23 AM Alan Stern wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:38:22PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > On 10/5/20 9:25 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:21:30PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > No, no -- it won't work right if it's called in process context.
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:38:22PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/5/20 9:25 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:21:30PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > No, no -- it won't work right if it's called in process context. Not
> > only do the spinlock calls leave the interrupt
On 10/5/20 9:25 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:21:30PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:18 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
Dear USB and USB/IP maintainers,
While fuzzing the USB/IP stack
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:22:18AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > Dear USB and USB/IP maintainers,
> >
> > While fuzzing the USB/IP stack with syzkaller we've stumbled upon an issue.
> >
> > Currently kcov (the subsystem that is
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:21:30PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:18 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > Dear USB and USB/IP maintainers,
> > >
> > > While fuzzing the USB/IP stack with syzkaller
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Dear USB and USB/IP maintainers,
>
> While fuzzing the USB/IP stack with syzkaller we've stumbled upon an issue.
>
> Currently kcov (the subsystem that is used for coverage collection)
> USB-related callbacks assume that
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 5:18 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > Dear USB and USB/IP maintainers,
> >
> > While fuzzing the USB/IP stack with syzkaller we've stumbled upon an issue.
> >
> > Currently kcov (the subsystem that is
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Dear USB and USB/IP maintainers,
>
> While fuzzing the USB/IP stack with syzkaller we've stumbled upon an issue.
>
> Currently kcov (the subsystem that is used for coverage collection)
> USB-related callbacks assume that
Dear USB and USB/IP maintainers,
While fuzzing the USB/IP stack with syzkaller we've stumbled upon an issue.
Currently kcov (the subsystem that is used for coverage collection)
USB-related callbacks assume that usb_hcd_giveback_urb() can only be
called from interrupt context, as indicated by the
9 matches
Mail list logo