On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 09:14 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 07:37 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >
> > > Was my patch ok, if so I'll push it up through my git tree to paul?
> >
> > Yeah, looks fine to me, or will the ARCH=ppc folks then
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 07:37 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> > Was my patch ok, if so I'll push it up through my git tree to paul?
>
> Yeah, looks fine to me, or will the ARCH=ppc folks then scream and want
> that added to the Kconfig there as well?
I
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 07:37 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Was my patch ok, if so I'll push it up through my git tree to paul?
Yeah, looks fine to me, or will the ARCH=ppc folks then scream and want
that added to the Kconfig there as well?
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On May 14, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 09:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
this was my fix which looks pretty much the same.
[...]
Great, thanks.
johannes
Was my patch ok, if so I'll push it up through my git tree to paul?
- k
-
To unsubscribe from this
On May 14, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 09:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
this was my fix which looks pretty much the same.
[...]
Great, thanks.
johannes
Was my patch ok, if so I'll push it up through my git tree to paul?
- k
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 07:37 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Was my patch ok, if so I'll push it up through my git tree to paul?
Yeah, looks fine to me, or will the ARCH=ppc folks then scream and want
that added to the Kconfig there as well?
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 07:37 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Was my patch ok, if so I'll push it up through my git tree to paul?
Yeah, looks fine to me, or will the ARCH=ppc folks then scream and want
that added to the Kconfig there as well?
I can't
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 09:14 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 07:37 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Was my patch ok, if so I'll push it up through my git tree to paul?
Yeah, looks fine to me, or will the ARCH=ppc folks then scream and
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 09:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> this was my fix which looks pretty much the same.
[...]
Great, thanks.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Simon,
>
> > I don't think that this is quite right, or at least it isn't quite the
> > same as before.
>
> Yeah, I think you're right.
>
> > I think that was is below will toggle
> > SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION when PMAC_APM_EMU is selected,
> > which
Simon,
> I don't think that this is quite right, or at least it isn't quite the
> same as before.
Yeah, I think you're right.
> I think that was is below will toggle
> SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION when PMAC_APM_EMU is selected,
> which I think is what you want. Is it also neccessary to
> add a
Simon,
I don't think that this is quite right, or at least it isn't quite the
same as before.
Yeah, I think you're right.
I think that was is below will toggle
SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION when PMAC_APM_EMU is selected,
which I think is what you want. Is it also neccessary to
add a
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Johannes Berg wrote:
Simon,
I don't think that this is quite right, or at least it isn't quite the
same as before.
Yeah, I think you're right.
I think that was is below will toggle
SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION when PMAC_APM_EMU is selected,
which I think is what
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 09:24 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
this was my fix which looks pretty much the same.
[...]
Great, thanks.
johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:45:37PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 10:22 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> > Actually, it was with ARCH=ia64. I have a feeling that you can get
> > it to show up quite easily with anything other than ARCH=powerpc.
>
> Ick, I didn't know that
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:45:37PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 10:22 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Actually, it was with ARCH=ia64. I have a feeling that you can get
it to show up quite easily with anything other than ARCH=powerpc.
Ick, I didn't know that
Russell King wrote:
You might also want to fix the other stupidity with this. See my message
on this very subject ("select is evil: another reason" from May 9th on lkml.)
I submitted a patch yesterday which includes both fixes. Apparently, it's
already in the -mm tree.
-
To unsubscribe
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 10:22 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Actually, it was with ARCH=ia64. I have a feeling that you can get
> it to show up quite easily with anything other than ARCH=powerpc.
Ick, I didn't know that drivers/macintosh was now included for all
arches! Hmm. That's a bit of a
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:56:48AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > > Simon Horman wrote:
> > >
> > > >>So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define "UCC_FAST_TEMP" and
> > >
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:56:48AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Simon Horman wrote:
So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define UCC_FAST_TEMP and
UCC_SLOW_TEMP? At first I
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 10:22 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Actually, it was with ARCH=ia64. I have a feeling that you can get
it to show up quite easily with anything other than ARCH=powerpc.
Ick, I didn't know that drivers/macintosh was now included for all
arches! Hmm. That's a bit of a problem.
Russell King wrote:
You might also want to fix the other stupidity with this. See my message
on this very subject (select is evil: another reason from May 9th on lkml.)
I submitted a patch yesterday which includes both fixes. Apparently, it's
already in the -mm tree.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:27:22AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:13:34PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > > Try this patch:
> > >
> > > That certainly
Simon Horman wrote:
I agree. I had thought a little about a kconfig fix. Though I'm
wondering if removing the warning will lead to oodles of dangling
symbols and invalid checks over time.
I'm pretty sure it will. Perhaps we need to have a lint for Kconfig?
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:13:34PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > Try this patch:
> >
> > That certainly resolves the problem for me.
> > I'll see about doing something like that for the
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Try this patch:
>
> That certainly resolves the problem for me.
> I'll see about doing something like that for the similar
> Kconfig problems that I see.
>
> --
> Horms
> H:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Try this patch:
That certainly resolves the problem for me.
I'll see about doing something like that for the similar
Kconfig problems that I see.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To
On May 10, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:56:48AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Simon Horman wrote:
So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define "UCC_FAST_TEMP" and
"UCC_SLOW_TEMP"? At first I thought, just put it in drivers/
Kconfig, but
that Kconfig does
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:56:48AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > Simon Horman wrote:
> >
> > >>So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define "UCC_FAST_TEMP" and
> > >>"UCC_SLOW_TEMP"? At first I thought, just put it in drivers/Kconfig, but
> > >>that
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:56:48AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Simon Horman wrote:
>
> >>So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define "UCC_FAST_TEMP" and
> >>"UCC_SLOW_TEMP"? At first I thought, just put it in drivers/Kconfig, but
> >>that Kconfig does nothing but including other Kconfigs.
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:39:29PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 14:10 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> > drivers/macintosh/Kconfig:112:warning: 'select' used by config symbol
> > 'PMAC_APM_EMU' refer to undefined symbol 'SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION'
>
> Argh. Is that with
Simon Horman wrote:
So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define "UCC_FAST_TEMP" and
"UCC_SLOW_TEMP"? At first I thought, just put it in drivers/Kconfig, but that
Kconfig does nothing but including other Kconfigs. I believe that if I submit
a patch that adds "UCC_FAST_TEMP" and
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 14:10 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> drivers/macintosh/Kconfig:112:warning: 'select' used by config symbol
> 'PMAC_APM_EMU' refer to undefined symbol 'SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION'
Argh. Is that with ARCH=ppc? I keep forgetting that it still exists,
sorry.
johannes
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 14:10 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
drivers/macintosh/Kconfig:112:warning: 'select' used by config symbol
'PMAC_APM_EMU' refer to undefined symbol 'SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION'
Argh. Is that with ARCH=ppc? I keep forgetting that it still exists,
sorry.
johannes
Simon Horman wrote:
So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define UCC_FAST_TEMP and
UCC_SLOW_TEMP? At first I thought, just put it in drivers/Kconfig, but that
Kconfig does nothing but including other Kconfigs. I believe that if I submit
a patch that adds UCC_FAST_TEMP and UCC_SLOW_TEMP
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:39:29PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 14:10 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
drivers/macintosh/Kconfig:112:warning: 'select' used by config symbol
'PMAC_APM_EMU' refer to undefined symbol 'SYS_SUPPORTS_APM_EMULATION'
Argh. Is that with ARCH=ppc?
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:56:48AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Simon Horman wrote:
So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define UCC_FAST_TEMP and
UCC_SLOW_TEMP? At first I thought, just put it in drivers/Kconfig, but
that Kconfig does nothing but including other Kconfigs. I believe that
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:56:48AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Simon Horman wrote:
So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define UCC_FAST_TEMP and
UCC_SLOW_TEMP? At first I thought, just put it in drivers/Kconfig, but
that Kconfig does nothing
On May 10, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:56:48AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Simon Horman wrote:
So my question is: in which Kconfig do I define UCC_FAST_TEMP and
UCC_SLOW_TEMP? At first I thought, just put it in drivers/
Kconfig, but
that Kconfig does
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Try this patch:
That certainly resolves the problem for me.
I'll see about doing something like that for the similar
Kconfig problems that I see.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
-
To
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Try this patch:
That certainly resolves the problem for me.
I'll see about doing something like that for the similar
Kconfig problems that I see.
--
Horms
H:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:13:34PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Try this patch:
That certainly resolves the problem for me.
I'll see about doing something like that for the similar
Simon Horman wrote:
I agree. I had thought a little about a kconfig fix. Though I'm
wondering if removing the warning will lead to oodles of dangling
symbols and invalid checks over time.
I'm pretty sure it will. Perhaps we need to have a lint for Kconfig?
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:27:22AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:13:34PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Simon Horman wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:47:05PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
Try this patch:
That certainly resolves the problem for
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:11:52PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kim Phillips wrote:
> >On Tue, 8 May 2007 00:04:14 +0300
> >Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>drivers/net/Kconfig:2279:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'UCC_GETH'
> >>refers to undefined symbol 'UCC_FAST'
> >looks
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:11:52PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 00:04:14 +0300
Ismail Dönmez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
drivers/net/Kconfig:2279:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'UCC_GETH'
refers to undefined symbol 'UCC_FAST'
looks like this
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 00:04:14 +0300
Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
drivers/net/Kconfig:2279:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'UCC_GETH'
refers to undefined symbol 'UCC_FAST'
looks like this introduces the error:
commit
On Tue, 8 May 2007 00:04:14 +0300
Ismail Dönmez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> drivers/net/Kconfig:2279:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'UCC_GETH'
> refers to undefined symbol 'UCC_FAST'
looks like this introduces the error:
commit 7d776cb596994219584257eb5956b87628e5deaf
Author:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 00:04:14 +0300
Ismail Dönmez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
drivers/net/Kconfig:2279:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'UCC_GETH'
refers to undefined symbol 'UCC_FAST'
looks like this introduces the error:
commit 7d776cb596994219584257eb5956b87628e5deaf
Author: Timur
Kim Phillips wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007 00:04:14 +0300
Ismail Dönmez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
drivers/net/Kconfig:2279:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'UCC_GETH'
refers to undefined symbol 'UCC_FAST'
looks like this introduces the error:
commit
Hi,
Following Kconfig warnings shows up with latest GIT :
drivers/net/Kconfig:2279:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'UCC_GETH'
refers to undefined symbol 'UCC_FAST'
drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig:170:warning: 'select' used by config
symbol 'KEYBOARD_ATARI' refers to undefined symbol
Hi,
Following Kconfig warnings shows up with latest GIT :
drivers/net/Kconfig:2279:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'UCC_GETH'
refers to undefined symbol 'UCC_FAST'
drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig:170:warning: 'select' used by config
symbol 'KEYBOARD_ATARI' refers to undefined symbol
52 matches
Mail list logo
