On Wed, 2 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To stay on systems probably more familiar to the user who asked this question,
> there are also some 64 core X86_64 bot AMD and Intel out there, here the 2.6
> kernel is doing very well even on those intel CPU with shared L2 cache.
> I have some 16
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kevin Fox wrote:
> There are multiple 512 processor altix's in production. :)
U.. There are also 1k configurations. 4k in testing. Expect 16k
sometime this year.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kevin Fox wrote:
There are multiple 512 processor altix's in production. :)
U.. There are also 1k configurations. 4k in testing. Expect 16k
sometime this year.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Wed, 2 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To stay on systems probably more familiar to the user who asked this question,
there are also some 64 core X86_64 bot AMD and Intel out there, here the 2.6
kernel is doing very well even on those intel CPU with shared L2 cache.
I have some 16 and
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>> There are 128-processor IA64 systems which run recent 2.6 kernels out
>> there; the per-processor counters, RCU and page-fault scalability work
>> has been instrumental to the necessary scaling for decent resource
>> usage on these.
>> IIRC, there
There are multiple 512 processor altix's in production. :)
Kevin
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 20:56 +0800, Rajib Majumder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
> 8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
> 2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond
"Rajib Majumder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
> 8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
> 2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond 4-CPU?
>
> If yes, is the scalablity is near linear?
I haven't a clue what
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:43:44 +0100
From: Daniel J Blueman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rajib Majumder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Linux Kernel
Subject: Re: Kernel Scalability
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:44:58 +0200
Resent-From: <[
On 5/2/07, Daniel J Blueman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are 128-processor IA64 systems which run recent 2.6 kernels out
there; the per-processor counters, RCU and page-fault scalability work
has been instrumental to the necessary scaling for decent resource
usage on these.
128 cpu is a
On 2 May, 14:00, "Rajib Majumder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond 4-CPU?
If yes, is the scalablity is near linear?
Any input is
Hi,
I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond 4-CPU?
If yes, is the scalablity is near linear?
Any input is appreciated.
Thanks
Rajib
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hi,
I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond 4-CPU?
If yes, is the scalablity is near linear?
Any input is appreciated.
Thanks
Rajib
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On 2 May, 14:00, Rajib Majumder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond 4-CPU?
If yes, is the scalablity is near linear?
Any input is
On 5/2/07, Daniel J Blueman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 128-processor IA64 systems which run recent 2.6 kernels out
there; the per-processor counters, RCU and page-fault scalability work
has been instrumental to the necessary scaling for decent resource
usage on these.
128 cpu is a bit
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 16:43:44 +0100
From: Daniel J Blueman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rajib Majumder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Linux Kernel linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Scalability
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 17:44:58 +0200
Resent-From
There are multiple 512 processor altix's in production. :)
Kevin
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 20:56 +0800, Rajib Majumder wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond
Rajib Majumder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond 4-CPU?
If yes, is the scalablity is near linear?
I haven't a clue what the data
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
There are 128-processor IA64 systems which run recent 2.6 kernels out
there; the per-processor counters, RCU and page-fault scalability work
has been instrumental to the necessary scaling for decent resource
usage on these.
IIRC, there were some
18 matches
Mail list logo
