Re: Kernel panics on raw I/O stress test

2001-04-20 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:44:35PM +0900, Takanori Kawano wrote: > > > Could you try again with 2.4.4pre4 plus the below patch? > > > > >ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.4/2.4.4pre2/rawio-3 > > I suppose that 2.4.4-pre4 + rawio-3 patch still has SMP-unsafe

Re: Kernel panics on raw I/O stress test

2001-04-20 Thread Takanori Kawano
> Could you try again with 2.4.4pre4 plus the below patch? > > >ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.4/2.4.4pre2/rawio-3 I suppose that 2.4.4-pre4 + rawio-3 patch still has SMP-unsafe raw i/o code and can cause the same panic I reported. I think the followin

Re: Kernel panics on raw I/O stress test

2001-04-19 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:01:53PM +0900, Takanori Kawano wrote: > > When I ran raw I/O SCSI read/write test with 2.4.1 kernel > on our IA64 8way SMP box, kernel paniced and following > message was displayed. Could you try again with 2.4.4pre4 plus the below patch? ftp://ftp.us.kerne

Re: Kernel panics on raw I/O stress test

2001-04-19 Thread Alan Cox
> When I ran raw I/O SCSI read/write test with 2.4.1 kernel > on our IA64 8way SMP box, kernel paniced and following > message was displayed. > > Aiee, killing interrupt handler! > > (1) Wait in rw_raw_dev() while io_count is positive. Stephen submitted a chunk of raw i/o fixes which are i

Kernel panics on raw I/O stress test

2001-04-19 Thread Takanori Kawano
When I ran raw I/O SCSI read/write test with 2.4.1 kernel on our IA64 8way SMP box, kernel paniced and following message was displayed. Aiee, killing interrupt handler! No stack trace and register dump are displayed. Then I analyze FSB traces around the panic, and found that following func