Re: Kildall

2016-10-17 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied as MS-DOS. When I analyse this, it seem

Re: Kildall

2016-10-17 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied as MS-DOS. When I analyse this, it seem

Re: Kildall

2016-10-16 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like Microsoft could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room. In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kild

Re: Kildall

2016-10-16 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
And later Microsoft took back its lead. A big corporation like Microsoft could probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room. In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kild

Re: Kildall

2016-10-15 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
d probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room. In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote

Re: Kildall

2016-10-15 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
d probably not be defeated. Unless ofcourse there was some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room. In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote

Re: Kildall

2016-10-06 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room. In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that

Re: Kildall

2016-10-06 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
some real issue, some obscurity, that was the blue elephant in the room. In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that

Re: Kildall

2016-10-03 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
s the blue elephant in the room. In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied as MS-D

Re: Kildall

2016-10-03 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
s the blue elephant in the room. In Linux it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied as MS-D

Kildall

2016-10-03 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied as MS-DOS. When I analyse this, it seems american n

Kildall

2016-10-03 Thread Ove Bjørn Karlsen
it is GNU. In Microsoft it is Gary Kildall. Many may not be aware, that Gary Kildall should actually have been the Bill Gates of today. He actually wrote the first microcomputer OS, CP/M (~Kernal/console) that Microsoft later infringed on, and copied as MS-DOS. When I analyse this, it seems american n