On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:41:31 -0800,
Torrey Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
>part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
>official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
>m
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 08:56:12PM -, you [mirabilos] claimed:
> From: "Torrey Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
> > part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
> > official sources, that good e
From: "Torrey Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
> part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
> official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
> maintainers do the same.
>
> To
Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
maintainers do the same.
Torrey Hoffman
>-Original Message-
>From: Keith
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:29:06PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:13:48 -0500,
> "Matthew Pitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Some distributions DO include the config. It may be located
> >in the /boot dir with a name CONFIG-2.2.10 or similar. I
> >know that Caldera 2.3 shipe
"Matthew Pitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some distributions DO include the config. It may be located
> in the /boot dir with a name CONFIG-2.2.10 or similar. I
> know that Caldera 2.3 shiped that way(2.4 may also). If you
> have the install CDROM, the kernel source install may have
> it (e.g
Well, even if the config file hasn't been included you can
presumably _write_ the config file from the kernel setup
program...and that is _probably_ the configuration of the
kernel you are running n'est-ce-pas?
Roger.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
t
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 00:13:48 -0500,
"Matthew Pitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Some distributions DO include the config. It may be located
>in the /boot dir with a name CONFIG-2.2.10 or similar. I
>know that Caldera 2.3 shiped that way(2.4 may also). If you
>have the install CDROM, the kernel so
Matthew and Keith,
Thank you to both of you for your input, info, and quick responses. I
just wanted to make shure there weren't tricks still in the bag that I
hadn't learned about in this area. I'll look for the config file.
Jacob Anawalt
Matthew Pitts wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:06:57 +1
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:06:57 +1100
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:21:41 -0700,
> Jacob Anawalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Is there a way to know what options a running kernel was
> compiled with,
> >if you dont have access to the source or configure files
> it
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:21:41 -0700,
Jacob Anawalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a way to know what options a running kernel was compiled with,
>if you dont have access to the source or configure files it was compiled
>off of?
No. You have to insist that whoever distributes the kernel bin
Is there a way to know what options a running kernel was compiled with,
if you dont have access to the source or configure files it was compiled
off of?
In particular, I am trying to discover if 'advanced router' and 'equal
cost multi path' options are compiled into RH7 kernel-2.2.16-22. I would
12 matches
Mail list logo
