Re: LBD/filesystems over 2TB: is it safe?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Running x86-32 using kernel 2.6.8 (from Debian sarge), although can always roll my own if necessary. Preferred filesystem would be ext3, and I anticipate no need to grow beyond the initial 2.5TB. I'm running 2.1TB and 3TB filesystems on ext3 here. It's probably not fast or

Re: LBD/filesystems over 2TB: is it safe?

> "jniehof" == jniehof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jniehof> Someone posted to the LBD list last December regarding some jniehof> supposedly horrible bugs in large filesystems: jniehof> https://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/lbd/2004-December/75.html jniehof> https://www.gelato.unsw.edu.a

LBD/filesystems over 2TB: is it safe?

Someone posted to the LBD list last December regarding some supposedly horrible bugs in large filesystems: https://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/lbd/2004-December/75.html https://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/lbd/2004-December/74.html (I will admit that these were brought to my attenti