Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:15:11PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 29 April 2018 at 07:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:25:17PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS > >>

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:15:11PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 29 April 2018 at 07:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:25:17PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > >> Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS > >> files [0], I was writing mine

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On 29 April 2018 at 07:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:25:17PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS >> files [0], I was writing mine using ISC. I had no very special reason >> for

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On 29 April 2018 at 07:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:25:17PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS >> files [0], I was writing mine using ISC. I had no very special reason >> for it: I was choosing between

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:03:15AM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:26:17AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I see it is only used in a very small number of dts files. Why not just > > use BSD-2-Clause instead? What do you find in ISC that is not available > > to

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:03:15AM +, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:26:17AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I see it is only used in a very small number of dts files. Why not just > > use BSD-2-Clause instead? What do you find in ISC that is not available > > to

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:26:17AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > I see it is only used in a very small number of dts files. Why not just > use BSD-2-Clause instead? What do you find in ISC that is not available > to you with just BSD? ISC license is a simplified version of the BSD license

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:26:17AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > I see it is only used in a very small number of dts files. Why not just > use BSD-2-Clause instead? What do you find in ISC that is not available > to you with just BSD? ISC license is a simplified version of the BSD license

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:25:17PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > Hi, > > Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS > files [0], I was writing mine using ISC. I had no very special reason > for it: I was choosing between BSD-2-Clause, MIT and ISC. I've chosen > ISC as I

Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:25:17PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > Hi, > > Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS > files [0], I was writing mine using ISC. I had no very special reason > for it: I was choosing between BSD-2-Clause, MIT and ISC. I've chosen > ISC as I

LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

Hi, Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS files [0], I was writing mine using ISC. I had no very special reason for it: I was choosing between BSD-2-Clause, MIT and ISC. I've chosen ISC as I read about its "removal of language deemed unnecessary". I took a moment to

LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")

Hi, Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS files [0], I was writing mine using ISC. I had no very special reason for it: I was choosing between BSD-2-Clause, MIT and ISC. I've chosen ISC as I read about its "removal of language deemed unnecessary". I took a moment to