Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-12 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Friday 11 March 2005 17:55, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Herbert Xu wrote: > > Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>You're right, good catch. IPT_RETURN is interpreted internally by > >>ip_tables, but since the value changed it isn't recognized by ip_tables > >>anymore and returned

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-12 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Friday 11 March 2005 17:55, Patrick McHardy wrote: Herbert Xu wrote: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right, good catch. IPT_RETURN is interpreted internally by ip_tables, but since the value changed it isn't recognized by ip_tables anymore and returned to nf_iterate()

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Patrick McHardy
Herbert Xu wrote: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You're right, good catch. IPT_RETURN is interpreted internally by ip_tables, but since the value changed it isn't recognized by ip_tables anymore and returned to nf_iterate() as NF_REPEAT. This patch restores the old value. Please fix

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Herbert Xu
Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You're right, good catch. IPT_RETURN is interpreted internally by > ip_tables, but since the value changed it isn't recognized by ip_tables > anymore and returned to nf_iterate() as NF_REPEAT. This patch restores > the old value. Please fix

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Patrick McHardy
David S. Miller wrote: Damn, wait, Patrick, I think I know what's happening. The iptables IPT_* verdicts are dependant upon the NF_* values, and they don't cope with Bart's changes I bet. Can you figure out what the exact error would be? This kind of issue would explain the looping inside of

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Sergey Vlasov
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:51:36 -0800 David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:00:56 +0100 > Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Works fine here. You could try if reverting one of these two patches > > helps (second one only if its a SMP box). > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Friday 11 March 2005 13:51, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:00:56 +0100 > Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Works fine here. You could try if reverting one of these two patches > > helps (second one only if its a SMP box). > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-09

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread David S. Miller
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:00:56 +0100 Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Works fine here. You could try if reverting one of these two patches > helps (second one only if its a SMP box). > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-09 20:28:17-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[NETFILTER]: Reduce call chain

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Patrick McHardy
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: My box gets stuck while booting (actually starting ntpd) whith tonight pull from Linus. It looks like it is spinning in ipt_do_table when I do SysRq-P. No call trace though. Please post your ruleset and .config. A backtrace would also be useful. Anyone else seeing it? Any

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Patrick McHardy
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: My box gets stuck while booting (actually starting ntpd) whith tonight pull from Linus. It looks like it is spinning in ipt_do_table when I do SysRq-P. No call trace though. Please post your ruleset and .config. A backtrace would also be useful. Anyone else seeing it? Any

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Friday 11 March 2005 13:51, David S. Miller wrote: On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:00:56 +0100 Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Works fine here. You could try if reverting one of these two patches helps (second one only if its a SMP box). [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-09

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Sergey Vlasov
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:51:36 -0800 David S. Miller wrote: On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:00:56 +0100 Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Works fine here. You could try if reverting one of these two patches helps (second one only if its a SMP box). [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2005-03-09

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Patrick McHardy
David S. Miller wrote: Damn, wait, Patrick, I think I know what's happening. The iptables IPT_* verdicts are dependant upon the NF_* values, and they don't cope with Bart's changes I bet. Can you figure out what the exact error would be? This kind of issue would explain the looping inside of

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Herbert Xu
Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right, good catch. IPT_RETURN is interpreted internally by ip_tables, but since the value changed it isn't recognized by ip_tables anymore and returned to nf_iterate() as NF_REPEAT. This patch restores the old value. Please fix netfilter_arp

Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-11 Thread Patrick McHardy
Herbert Xu wrote: Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right, good catch. IPT_RETURN is interpreted internally by ip_tables, but since the value changed it isn't recognized by ip_tables anymore and returned to nf_iterate() as NF_REPEAT. This patch restores the old value. Please fix

Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-10 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi, My box gets stuck while booting (actually starting ntpd) whith tonight pull from Linus. It looks like it is spinning in ipt_do_table when I do SysRq-P. No call trace though. Anyone else seeing it? Any ideas? -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?

2005-03-10 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
Hi, My box gets stuck while booting (actually starting ntpd) whith tonight pull from Linus. It looks like it is spinning in ipt_do_table when I do SysRq-P. No call trace though. Anyone else seeing it? Any ideas? -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel