On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:19:05PM -0500, Li Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > However, we can't dictate to people what license they wish to submit
> > their work under; though, we can make the decision whether to accept
> > it under the license t
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 07:14:30PM +, Li Leo wrote:
>> I saw some discussion going on last year about the permissive license
>> to be used in ARM device tree files. I know a lot of files have been
>> changed to use GPLv2/X11 l
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 07:14:30PM +, Li Leo wrote:
> I saw some discussion going on last year about the permissive license
> to be used in ARM device tree files. I know a lot of files have been
> changed to use GPLv2/X11 license. But may I know if GPLv2/BSD 3-clause
> dual license is still a
Hi All,
I saw some discussion going on last year about the permissive license to be
used in ARM device tree files. I know a lot of files have been changed to use
GPLv2/X11 license. But may I know if GPLv2/BSD 3-clause dual license is still
a valid license to use in ARM device tree files. It
4 matches
Mail list logo
