Original Message
Subject: Re: [DNG] 2 months and no response from Eben Moglen - Yes you
can rescind your grant. -- The CoC regime is a License violation -
Additional restrictive terms
Date: 2018-12-24 16:24
From: vnsnda...@memeware.net
To: d...@lists.dyne.org
Version 2 of
Hendrik Boom, are you a lawyer?
No? How about you shut your fucking mouth about things you have no clue
of?
Sound like a plan, ignorant lay person?
Below is an explanation of just how it is a violation of the
rights-holder's grant. The courts are not fooled by "clever" verbiage
written up by
Version 2 of the GPL forbids the incorporation of additional
restrictive terms, relating to the distribution, modification, etc of
the article licensed under the terms.
Those that violate this section are declared, by operation of the
terms, to have their grant automatically revoked.
An addition
Version 2 of the GPL forbids the incorporation of additional
restrictive terms, relating to the distribution, modification, etc of
the article licensed under the terms.
Those that violate this section are declared, by operation of the
terms, to have their grant automatically revoked.
An addition
Version 2 of the GPL forbids the incorporation of additional
restrictive terms, relating to the distribution, modification, etc of
the article licensed under the terms.
Those that violate this section are declared, by operation of the
terms, to have their grant automatically revoked.
An addition
Version 2 of the GPL forbids the incorporation of additional
restrictive terms, relating to the distribution, modification, etc of
the article licensed under the terms.
Those that violate this section are declared, by operation of the
terms, to have their grant automatically revoked.
An addition
> I have a GPL driver (written by me) with workarounds, since I hadn't
> know-how,
> when I wrote it. Now I've got 2.4 proprietary driver from the vendor.
> Is use of
> the 2.4 driver know-how OK? (And could be such driver merged?)
Unless you made some kind of agreement with the copyright holde
Alan napsal(a):
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:37:45 -0800
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jiri Slaby wrote:
No other text in there, but simple Copyright:
/* Copyright (c) 1997-2002 Sensable Technologies, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Well, I think that means you can use info from that
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:37:45 -0800
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > No other text in there, but simple Copyright:
> >
> > /* Copyright (c) 1997-2002 Sensable Technologies, Inc.
> >All rights reserved.
>
> Well, I think that means you can use info from tha
Jeremy Fitzhardinge napsal(a):
Jiri Slaby wrote:
Nice to hear this, thanks,
Don't take it as legal advice. If you have any agreements with the
provider of the proprietary driver, you should check with them or a lawyer.
After digging through the whole e-mail from person, who gave me a note t
Jeremy Fitzhardinge napsal(a):
Jiri Slaby wrote:
No other text in there, but simple Copyright:
/* Copyright (c) 1997-2002 Sensable Technologies, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Well, I think that means you can use info from that file to make your's
better, but you can't copy actual code.
Nice
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> No other text in there, but simple Copyright:
>
> /* Copyright (c) 1997-2002 Sensable Technologies, Inc.
>All rights reserved.
Well, I think that means you can use info from that file to make your's
better, but you can't copy actual code.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this l
Jeremy Fitzhardinge napsal(a):
Jiri Slaby wrote:
Hi.
I have a GPL driver (written by me) with workarounds, since I hadn't
know-how, when I wrote it. Now I've got 2.4 proprietary driver from
the vendor. Is use of the 2.4 driver know-how OK? (And could be such
driver merged?)
These are lines fro
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a GPL driver (written by me) with workarounds, since I hadn't
> know-how, when I wrote it. Now I've got 2.4 proprietary driver from
> the vendor. Is use of the 2.4 driver know-how OK? (And could be such
> driver merged?)
>
> These are lines from the proprietary dr
Hi.
I have a GPL driver (written by me) with workarounds, since I hadn't know-how,
when I wrote it. Now I've got 2.4 proprietary driver from the vendor. Is use of
the 2.4 driver know-how OK? (And could be such driver merged?)
These are lines from the proprietary driver:
IMPORTANT S
15 matches
Mail list logo
